Improvement in adequacy of delivered dialysis for adult in-center hemodialysis patients in the United States, 1993 to 1995

被引:41
|
作者
Helgerson, SD
McClellan, WM
Frederick, PR
Beaver, SK
Frankenfield, DL
McMullan, M
机构
[1] US HLTH CARE FINANCING ADM,BALTIMORE,MD 21207
[2] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,CTR CLIN EVALUAT SCI,PROGRAM HYPERTENS & RENAL DIS HLTH SERV RES,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
end-stage renal disease; hemodialysis; quality of care indicators; urea reduction ratio;
D O I
10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90458-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this review is to describe the adequacy of delivered dialysis provided to in-center hemodialysis patients in the United States and to compare the findings with published guidelines. The medical records of random samples of 6,138, 6,919, and 6,861 patients in hemodialysis facilities were studied from all Medicare-eligible adult in-center hemodialysis patients alive on December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. The main clinical measure used was the urea reduction ratio (URR), the mean of which was 0.63 in 1993, 0.64 in 1994, and 0.66 in 1995. The proportion of patients with URR greater than or equal to 0.65, as recommended by the Renal Physicians Association and a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, increased from 43% in 1993 to 49% in 1994 and 59% in 1995. In each of these 3 years, women were more likely than men to have a URR greater than or equal to 0.65 (1993: 54% v 31%, odds ratio 2.6; 1994: 61% v 38%, odds ratio 2.5; and 1995: 70% v 50%, odds ratio 2.4), as were older patients (65+ years) compared with younger patients (18 to 44 years) (1993: 47% v 37%, odds ratio 1.4; 1994: 54% v 45%, odds ratio 1.5; and 1995: 65% v 53%, odds ratio 1.6) and white patients compared with black patients (1993: 46% v 36%, odds ratio 1.5; 1994: 53% v 43%, odds ratio 1.5; and 1995: 63% v 54%, odds ratio 1.4). There was also substantial geographic variation in the proportion of patients receiving hemodialysis with a URR greater than or equal to 0.65. In conclusion, marked differences existed in 1993, 1994, and 1995 between observed practice and consensus guidelines for the delivery of adequate dialysis. Nevertheless, notable improvement occurred during this time period. A system to monitor further improvements in hemodialysis care in the United States is in place.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 861
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Perceptions about the dialysis modality decision process among peritoneal dialysis and in-center hemodialysis patients
    Zee, Jarcy
    Zhao, Junhui
    Subramanian, Lalita
    Perry, Erica
    Bryant, Nicole
    McCall, Margie
    Restovic, Yanko
    Torres, Delma
    Robinson, Bruce M.
    Pisoni, Ronald L.
    Tentori, Francesca
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 19
  • [12] In-Center Nutrition Practices of Clinics within a Large Hemodialysis Provider in the United States
    Benner, Debbie
    Burgess, Mary
    Stasios, Maria
    Brosch, Becky
    Wilund, Ken
    Shen, Sa
    Kistler, Brandon
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 11 (05): : 770 - 775
  • [13] Perceptions about the dialysis modality decision process among peritoneal dialysis and in-center hemodialysis patients
    Jarcy Zee
    Junhui Zhao
    Lalita Subramanian
    Erica Perry
    Nicole Bryant
    Margie McCall
    Yanko Restovic
    Delma Torres
    Bruce M. Robinson
    Ronald L. Pisoni
    Francesca Tentori
    BMC Nephrology, 19
  • [14] BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS VS. CONVENTIONAL IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Liu, Frank Xiaoqing
    Leipold, Robert
    Arici, Murat
    Farooqui, Usman
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 : 215 - 215
  • [15] "Why I Chose Hemodialysis Over Peritoneal Dialysis": An Opinion Survey Among In-Center Hemodialysis Patients
    Valson, Anna T.
    Asad, Riyaz A.
    Radhakrishnan, Radhika C.
    Sinha, Shampa
    Jacob, Shibu
    Varughese, Santosh
    Tamilarasi, Veerasamy
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (04): : 305 - 308
  • [16] COMPARISON OF BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS VERSUS IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH CALCIPHYLAXIS
    Cobb, Jason
    Elfasi, Abduljalil
    Franck, Jean-Luc
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2017, 69 (04) : A36 - A36
  • [17] Use of a Decision Aid for Patients Considering Peritoneal Dialysis and In-Center Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Subramanian, Lalita
    Zhao, Junhui
    Zee, Jarcy
    Knaus, Megan
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Perry, Erica
    Swartz, June
    McCall, Margie
    Bryant, Nicole
    Tentori, Francesca
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [18] LOWER RISK OF EARLY DEATH IN INCIDENT DIALYSIS PATIENTS ON DAILY HOME VERSUS IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS
    Weinhandl, Eric
    Collins, Allan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2015, 65 (04) : A89 - A89
  • [19] IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS WHO MISS MULTIPLE DIALYSIS SESSIONS EXPERIENCE HIGHER MORTALITY RATES
    Morgan, Benjamin
    Ishani, Areef
    Slinin, Yelena
    Guo, Haifeng
    Li, Suying
    Liu, Jiannong
    Gilbertson, Dave
    Collins, Allan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2012, 59 (04) : A58 - A58
  • [20] QUALITY-OF-LIFE OF PATIENTS ON IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS VERSUS CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    TUCKER, CM
    ZILLER, RC
    SMITH, WR
    MARS, DR
    COONS, MP
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 11 (04): : 341 - 346