Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in prediction of Gleason score upgrading and disease upstaging in low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance

被引:23
|
作者
Gokce, Mehmet Ilker [1 ]
Tangal, Semih [2 ]
Hamidi, Nurullah [1 ]
Suer, Evren [1 ]
Ibis, Muhammed Arif [1 ]
Beduk, Yasar [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ufuk Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MEN; OUTCOMES; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.3550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active surveillance (AS) is an option for management of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, grade and stage progression is an important consideration. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a useful marker of cancer-related inflammation. In this study, we aimed to identify the roles of neutrophil count (NC), lymphocyte count (LC), and NLR to predict Gleason score (GS) upgrading, disease upstaging, and biochemical recurrence rates (BCR) in low-risk PCa patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 210 low-risk PCa patients eligible for AS, but who underwent radical prostatectomy. The roles of NC, LC, and NLR on the GS upgrading, disease upstaging, and BCR rates were investigated. Univariate and multivariate models were used to determine the effect of these parameters. Results: There were 104 and 106 patients in the NLR <2.5 and NLR >= 2.5 groups, respectively. GS upgrading in the NLR >= 2.5 group was more common than in the NLR<2.5 group (p=0.04). The NLR >= 2.5 group had significantly higher GS (8-10; p=0.03). With regard to NLR, the groups were found to have similar rates of disease upstaging (9/104 in NLR <2.5 vs. 16/106 in NLR >= 2.5; p=0.200). BCR rates were also significantly different between groups (p=0.033). NC an LC were not found to be associated with GS upgrading, disease upstaging, or BCR. Conclusions: NLR is a predictor of GS upgrading and BCR, but not disease upstaging in patients with low-risk PCa. Furthermore, higher NLR was found to be associated with higher GS PCa. NLR is a cost-effective and easily accessible tool that can be used in the decision-making process for treatment of low-risk PCa cases.
引用
收藏
页码:E383 / E387
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING IN NCCN VERY LOW RISK CLASSIFICATION PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Nazmy, Michael
    Lau, Clayton
    Wilson, Timothy
    Yamzon, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E284 - E284
  • [32] Polygenic Risk Score and Upgrading in Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Active Surveillance
    Goss, Louisa B.
    Liu, Menghan
    Zheng, Yingye
    Guo, Boya
    Conti, David V.
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Kachuri, Linda
    Catalona, William J.
    Witte, John S.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Darst, Burcu F.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2025, 11 (02) : 168 - 171
  • [33] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Black Patients
    Butler, Santino
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Chavez, Janice
    Fullerton, Zoe
    Mahal, Aman
    Nezolosky, Michelle
    Vastola, Marie
    Zhao, Shuang G.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Dess, Robert T.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    King, Martin T.
    Mouw, Kent W.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (21): : 2070 - 2072
  • [34] The role of MRI-targeted and confirmatory biopsies for cancer upstaging at selection in patients considered for active surveillance for clinically low-risk prostate cancer
    Marliere, Francois
    Puech, Philippe
    Benkirane, Ahmed
    Villers, Arnauld
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Leroy, Xavier
    Betrouni, Nacim
    Ouzzane, Adil
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (04) : 951 - 958
  • [35] The role of MRI-targeted and confirmatory biopsies for cancer upstaging at selection in patients considered for active surveillance for clinically low-risk prostate cancer
    François Marliere
    Philippe Puech
    Ahmed Benkirane
    Arnauld Villers
    Laurent Lemaitre
    Xavier Leroy
    Nacim Betrouni
    Adil Ouzzane
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 951 - 958
  • [36] GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING IN PATIENTS WITH UNILATERAL PROSTATE CANCER: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTION INTO ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE REGIMEN.
    Grover, Sonal
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Tan, Gerald
    Peters, David
    Mudaliar, Kumaran
    El-Douaihy, Youssef
    Leung, Robert
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E790 - E790
  • [37] Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Nassiri, Nima
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Sharma, Devi S.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03): : 632 - 639
  • [38] Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
    Pham, Duc Minh
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Lee, Sangchul
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 61 (04) : 405 - 410
  • [39] Does extent of prostate-specific antigen fluctuation can predict Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients?
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Atmaca, Ali Fuat
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Keske, Murat
    Ardicoglu, Arslan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 : 42 - 48
  • [40] The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep, Samed
    Erdem, Selcuk
    Ozluk, Yasemin
    Kilicaslan, Isin
    Sanli, Oner
    Ozcan, Faruk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (13): : 1523 - 1529