A Patient Safety Toolkit for Family Practices

被引:13
|
作者
Campbell, Stephen M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bell, Brian G. [4 ]
Marsden, Kate [4 ]
Spencer, Rachel [4 ]
Kadam, Umesh [5 ]
Perryman, Katherine [1 ]
Rodgers, Sarah [4 ]
Litchfield, Ian [6 ]
Reeves, David [2 ]
Chuter, Antony [7 ]
Doos, Lucy [6 ,7 ]
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio [8 ]
Gill, Paramjit [6 ]
Esmail, Aneez [2 ]
Greenfield, Sheila [6 ]
Slight, Sarah [8 ]
Middleton, Karen [9 ]
Barnett, Jane [9 ]
Moore, Michael [10 ]
Valderas, Jose M. [11 ]
Sheikh, Aziz [12 ]
Avery, Anthony J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safe, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Populat, Ctr Primary Care, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Canberra, Ctr Res & Act Publ Hlth CeRAPH, Bruce, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Nottingham, Med Sch, Queens Med Ctr, Div Primary Care, Nottingham, England
[5] Keele Univ, Guy Hilton Res Ctr, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] 68 Brighton Cottages,Copyhold Lane, Haywards Heath, W Sussex, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[9] Univ Southampton, Primary Med Care, Southampton, Hants, England
[10] Univ Southampton, Primary Care & Populat Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[11] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Hlth Serv & Policy Res Grp, Exeter, Devon, England
[12] Univ Edinburgh, Med Sch, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
primary care; patient safety; safety climate; PRIMARY-CARE; GENERAL PRACTICES; ERRORS; COMMUNICATION; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PTS.0000000000000471
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Major gaps remain in our understanding of primary care patient safety. We describe a toolkit for measuring patient safety in family practices. Methods Six tools were used in 46 practices. These tools were as follows: National Health Service Education for Scotland Trigger Tool, National Health Service Education for Scotland Medicines Reconciliation Tool, Primary Care Safequest, Prescribing Safety Indicators, Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care, and Concise Safe Systems Checklist. Results Primary Care Safequest showed that most practices had a well-developed safety climate. However, the trigger tool revealed that a quarter of events identified were associated with moderate or substantial harm, with a third originating in primary care and avoidable. Although medicines reconciliation was undertaken within 2 days in more than 70% of cases, necessary discussions with a patient/carer did not always occur. The prescribing safety indicators identified 1435 instances of potentially hazardous prescribing or lack of recommended monitoring (from 92,649 patients). The Concise Safe Systems Checklist found that 25% of staff thought that their practice provided inadequate follow-up for vulnerable patients discharged from hospital and inadequate monitoring of noncollection of prescriptions. Most patients had a positive perception of the safety of their practice although 45% identified at least one safety problem in the past year. Conclusions Patient safety is complex and multidimensional. The Patient Safety Toolkit is easy to use and hosted on a single platform with a collection of tools generating practical and actionable information. It enables family practices to identify safety deficits that they can review and change procedures to improve their patient safety across a key sets of patient safety issues.
引用
收藏
页码:E182 / E186
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The organization and distribution of patient education materials in family medicine practices
    McVea, KLSP
    Venugopal, M
    Crabtree, BF
    Aita, V
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 49 (04): : 319 - 326
  • [42] Patient safety culture in Family practice residents of Galicia
    Portela Romero, Manuel
    Bugarin Gonzalez, Rosendo
    Rodriguez Calvo, Maria Sol
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2017, 49 (06): : 343 - 350
  • [43] A short questionnaire for measuring the quality of patient visits to family practices
    Marcinowicz, Ludmila
    Rybaczuk, Mikolaj
    Grebowski, Ryszard
    Chlabicz, Slawomir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 22 (04) : 294 - 301
  • [44] Patient safety: perception of family members of hospitalized children
    Franco, Larissa Fernandes
    Bonelli, Maria Aparecida
    Wernet, Monika
    Barbieri, Mayara Caroline
    Dupas, Giselle
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 73 (05)
  • [45] Nurse Sensemaking for Responding to Patient and Family Safety Concerns
    Groves, Patricia S.
    Bunch, Jacinda L.
    Cannava, Kaitlin E.
    Sabadosa, Kathryn A.
    Williams, Janet K.
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 70 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [46] Implementing Patient Safety Practices in Small Ambulatory Care Settings
    Schauberger, Charles W.
    Larson, Paul
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2006, 32 (08): : 419 - 425
  • [47] Use of a comprehensive patient safety tool in primary care practices
    Pohl, Joanne M.
    Nath, Radhika
    Zheng, Kai
    Rachman, Fred
    Gans, David N.
    Tanner, Clare
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2013, 25 (08) : 415 - 418
  • [48] Engaging the patient and family in the surgical safety process utilizing
    Elger, Breanna M.
    Esparaz, Joseph R.
    Nierstedt, Ryan T.
    Jennetten, Robert C.
    Aprahamian, Charles J.
    Pearl, Richard H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2020, 55 (04) : 597 - 601
  • [49] Dentists' practices and patient safety: A cross-sectional study
    Al-Mahalawy, Haytham
    El-Mahallawy, Yehia
    El Tantawi, Maha
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2020, 24 (03) : 381 - 389
  • [50] Good practices for patient safety in the operating room: nurses' recommendations
    Gutierres, Larissa de Siqueira
    Guedes dos Santos, Jose Luis
    Peiter, Caroline Cechinel
    Antunes Menegon, Fernando Henrique
    Sebold, Luciara Fabiane
    Erdmann, Alacoque Lorenzini
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 71 : 2775 - 2782