Effects of Tunnel Dilation and Interference Screw Position on the Biomechanical Properties of Tendon Graft Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:10
|
作者
Higano, Masanori [1 ]
Tachibana, Yomei [2 ]
Sakaguchi, Katunobu
Goto, Tatsuru
Oda, Hiromi
机构
[1] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Moroyama, Saitama 3500495, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Div Sports Med, Moroyama, Saitama 3500495, Japan
关键词
TIBIAL TUNNEL; PORCINE TIBIA; PULL-OUT; STRENGTH; PATELLAR; BONE; PLACEMENT; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.263
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of screw position and compaction of the bone tunnel on the strength of the flexor tendon graft after fixation using interference screws. Methods: Forty fresh-frozen porcine tibias were used for this study. The digital flexor tendons were folded into a quadrupled graft measuring 9 mm in diameter. In the extraction-drilling group, tibial bone tunnels were drilled with a conventional cannulated 9-mm drill bit in a single step. In the compaction-drilling group, bone tunnels were drilled using a cannulated 7-mm drill bit and were expanded to a final diameter of 9 mm in 0.5-mm increments by placement of dilators with increasing diameter. The grafts were fixed using 9 x 30-mm titanium screws in central and eccentric positions. Specimens underwent a cyclic-loading test, and the surviving specimens were then loaded until failure. Results: Graft displacement after 1,500 loading cycles occurred significantly more often in the extraction-drilling group with eccentric screw placement than in the groups of extraction-drilling (P < .05) and compaction-drilling (P < .01) with central screw placement. There were no statistically significant differences for the maximum screw insertion torque, maximum load at failure, or stiffness among the 4 groups. One strand of the quadrupled tendon grafts showed partial injury during screw insertion in 3 (30%) and 4 (40%) of 10 specimens of the extraction-drilling and compaction-drilling groups with central screw placement, respectively. Conclusions: Central screw placement significantly decreased the displacement of the tendon graft in comparison with eccentric screw placement in the extraction-drilling condition. Compaction of the bone tunnel walls by serial dilation in a central screw position did not increase the strength of interference screw fixation of a soft tissue graft.
引用
收藏
页码:1804 / 1810
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees
    Hung, Chu-Chih
    Chen, Wen-Chuan
    Yang, Chan-Tsung
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    Chen, Chih-Hwa
    Lai, Yu-Shu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2014, 2 (02) : 82 - 90
  • [32] Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar-tendon autograft and interference screw fixation - The results at seven years
    Jomha, NM
    Pinczewski, LA
    Clingeleffer, A
    Otto, DD
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05): : 775 - 779
  • [33] Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with a patellar tendon graft: Interference screw versus staple fixation in human knees
    Gerich T.G.
    Cassim A.
    Lattermann C.
    Lobenhoffer H.P.
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (2) : 84 - 88
  • [34] Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
    Yuanjun Teng
    Xiaohui Zhang
    Lijun Da
    Jie Hu
    Hong Wang
    Hua Han
    Meng Wu
    Shifeng Zhang
    Yayi Xia
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [35] A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES OF GRAFT FIXATION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    KUROSAKA, M
    YOSHIYA, S
    ANDRISH, JT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (03): : 225 - 229
  • [36] Biomechanics of soft-tissue interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Brand, JC
    Caborn, DNM
    Johnson, DL
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 26 (04) : 432 - 439
  • [37] Biomechanical testing of hybrid hamstring graft tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yoo, Jae Chul
    Ahn, Jin Hwan
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Byung Kwan
    Choi, Kui Won
    Bae, Tae Soo
    Lee, Chang Yang
    KNEE, 2006, 13 (06): : 455 - 459
  • [38] Reverse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison Study of Tibial Cross-Pin and Femoral Interference Screw Fixation
    Lawley, Richard J.
    Klein, Samuel E.
    Chudik, Steven C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (03): : 625 - 632
  • [39] Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
    Teng, Yuanjun
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Da, Lijun
    Hu, Jie
    Wang, Hong
    Han, Hua
    Wu, Meng
    Zhang, Shifeng
    Xia, Yayi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [40] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous quadriceps tendon graft and press fit fixation
    Höher J.
    Akoto R.
    Arthroskopie, 2018, 31 (3) : 215 - 220