Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Thoracic Salvage Screws in the Osteoporotic Thoracic Spine

被引:2
|
作者
Behrend, Caleb [1 ]
George, Stephen [2 ]
Molinari, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech Carilion SOM Res Inst, Div Orthoped Surg, Roanoke, VA USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Strong Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
关键词
biomechanics; anterior thoracic; screw; pullout; revision; osteoporosis; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE CEMENT; CERVICAL PLATE FIXATION; CANCELLOUS BONE SCREWS; PULLOUT STRENGTH; PEDICLE SCREWS; RESCUE SCREWS; PILOT HOLE; AUGMENTATION; REVISION; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e318286f657
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design:Controlled, cadaveric implantation trial.Objective:Evaluation of revision thoracic screw fixation: with revision from unicortical screws to bicortical screws, to larger diameter screws, and the addition of bone cement.Summary of Background Data:Limited data is available regarding the effect of salvage screws on fixation quality in the anterior thoracic spine. Biomechanical studies in the cervical spine and the lumbar spine demonstrate dramatic decreases in fixation in salvage situations.Methods:Seventy-two cadaveric thoracic vertebrae from 6 specimens were DEXA scanned at T1-T12. A control screw and a second identical screw were placed in each segment. One screw was then removed and replaced with a revision screw. Varying screw diameter, the number of cortices, and the addition of 1.5 cm(3) of bone cement was evaluated in a pairwise fashion. Comparisons were made using descriptive statistical analysis and a general linear statistical model.Results:Bone mineral density had a significant effect on the pullout force. Pullout force did not vary significantly with control screw diameter. Revision of a smaller diameter bicortical to a larger diameter bicortical screw resulted in a decrease in pullout strength for 4-5 mm screws by 40.1% (P=0.02) and 5-7 mm screws by 63.7% (P=0.05). When a 4 mm bicortical screw is revised to a 5 mm unicortical screw, the pullout force decreases by 67.7% (P<0.001). There was a nonsignificant increase (44%) in pullout with revision of a unicortical 4 mm screw to a bicortical 4 mm screw. If a bicortical screw is revised to a unicortical screw with 1.5 cm(3) of cement, the pullout strength is increased by 240% (P<0.001).Conclusions:When the use of salvage screws is required, the surgeon should anticipate a significant decrease in the holding force compared with the original screw regardless of screw size unless a unicortical screw is revised to a bicortical screw or cement is added to the construct.
引用
收藏
页码:E235 / E239
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Analysis of Derotation of the Thoracic Spine Using Pedicle Screws
    Cheng, Ivan
    Hay, David
    Iezza, Alex
    Lindsey, Derek
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (10) : 1039 - 1043
  • [2] Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine
    Michio Hongo
    Brice Ilharreborde
    Ralph E. Gay
    Chunfeng Zhao
    Kristin D. Zhao
    Lawrence J. Berglund
    Mark Zobitz
    Kai-Nan An
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 1213 - 1219
  • [3] Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine
    Hongo, Michio
    Ilharreborde, Brice
    Gay, Ralph E.
    Zhao, Chunfeng
    Zhao, Kristin D.
    Berglund, Lawrence J.
    Zobitz, Mark
    An, Kai-Nan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (08) : 1213 - 1219
  • [4] Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine - Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure
    Heller, JG
    Shuster, JK
    Hutton, WC
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (07) : 654 - 658
  • [5] Biomechanical study on thoracic spine segment fixed by pedicle screws placed with funnel technique
    Liu, Liang-Le
    Tang, Cheng-Xuan
    Yang, Guo-Jing
    Zhang, Li-Chen
    Lu, Cheng-Lin
    Zhang, Dong-Sheng
    Pan, Ke-Ping
    Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2010, 25 (02): : 89 - 93
  • [6] ANTERIOR EXPOSURE OF THE THORACIC SPINE
    NAUNHEIM, KS
    BARNETT, MG
    CRANDALL, DG
    VACA, KJ
    BURKUS, JK
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1994, 57 (06): : 1436 - 1439
  • [7] Anterior approach to the thoracic spine
    De Giacomo, Tiziano
    Francioni, Federico
    Diso, Daniele
    Tarantino, Roberto
    Anile, Marco
    Venuta, Federico
    Coloni, Giorgio Furio
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (05) : 692 - 695
  • [8] A THORACIC SPINE TESTBED FOR THE COMPARATIVE BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL INSTRUMENTATIONS
    LEWIS, G
    DREWRY, TD
    SHERMAN, MC
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1995, 8 (03): : 186 - 194
  • [9] A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling
    Puttlitz, Christian M.
    Masaru, Fujita
    Barkley, Antonia
    Diab, Mohammed
    Acaroglu, Emre
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (07) : 766 - 771
  • [10] Osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine
    Roth, S.
    Oberthuer, S.
    Sehmisch, S.
    Decker, S.
    UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2024, : 263 - 272