Intubation by paramedics using the ILMA or AirTraq, KingVision, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in vehicle-entrapped patients: a manikin study

被引:18
|
作者
Gaszynska, Ewelina [1 ]
Samsel, Piotr [2 ]
Stankiewicz-Rudnicki, Michal [3 ]
Wieczorek, Andrzej [3 ]
Gaszynski, Tomasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Hyg & Hlth Promot, PL-92216 Lodz, Poland
[2] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Emergency Med & Disaster Med, PL-92216 Lodz, Poland
[3] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Therapy, PL-92216 Lodz, Poland
关键词
airway management; laryngeal mask; trapped; videolaryngoscope; LARYNGEAL-MASK AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; RESTRICTED ACCESS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283632fb6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Four devices were compared in a simulated scenario of a vehicle-entrapped patient: standard Macintosh laryngoscope, intubating laryngeal mask (ILMA), AirTraq optical laryngoscope, and KingVision videolaryngoscope. A group of 30 final-year paramedic students intubated a manikin placed in a sitting position under a desk simulating the roof of a car. Time of endotracheal intubation and success ratio were recorded. The baseline time of intubation was measured in a manikin lying down flat on the ground. The mean time to intubation was 13.9 +/- 6.6, 24.7 +/- 4.7, 25.2 +/- 3.7, and 23.9 +/- 4.2 s; the first attempt success ratios for devices were 29/30, 18/30, 6/30, and 18/30; and the baseline time of intubation was 14.3 +/- 6.5, 16.7 +/- 4.7, 22.9 +/- 12.6, and 18.1 +/- 5.0 s for ILMA, Macintosh laryngoscope, Airtraq, and KingVision, respectively. In emergency situations with very limited access to the patient, ILMA is the most effective device for intubation by paramedics. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 64
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways: a manikin study
    Carassiti, M.
    Zanzonico, R.
    Cecchini, S.
    Silvestri, S.
    Cataldo, R.
    Agro, F. E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 (01) : 146 - 151
  • [32] Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin Study
    Xue, Fu S.
    Xiong, Jun
    Wang, Qiang
    Yuan, Yu J.
    Liao, Xu
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (04): : 1007 - 1008
  • [33] Study on Haemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation using McCOY and Macintosh Laryngoscopes: A Comparative Approach
    Barish, M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 33 (40A) : 320 - 324
  • [34] Ability of paramedics to perform endotracheal intubation during continuous chest compressions: a randomized cadaver study comparing Pentax AWS and Macintosh laryngoscopes
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Smereka, Jacek
    Krajewski, Pawel
    Fudalej, Marcin
    Madziala, Marcin
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (09): : 1835 - 1839
  • [35] Endotracheal intubation of COVID-19 patients by paramedics using a box barrier: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Feldman, Oren
    Samuel, Nir
    Kvatinsky, Noa
    Idelman, Ravit
    Diamand, Raz
    Shavit, Itai
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [36] Intubation performance using different laryngoscopes while wearing chemical protective equipment: a manikin study
    Schroeder, H.
    Zoremba, N.
    Rossaint, R.
    Deusser, K.
    Stoppe, C.
    Coburn, M.
    Rieg, A.
    Schaelte, G.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [37] Tracheal intubation for a difficult airway using Airway scope®, KingVision® and McGRATH®: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel
    J Itai
    Y Tanabe
    T Nishida
    T Inagawa
    Y Torikoshi
    Y Kida
    T Tamura
    K Ota
    T Otani
    T Sadamori
    K Une
    R Tsumura
    Y Iwasaki
    N Hirohashi
    K Tanigawal
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [38] A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via I-gel in intubating an entrapped patient: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Bielski, Karol
    Smereka, Jacek
    Ladny, Jerzy R.
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (05): : 787 - 789
  • [39] A manikin study comparing the performance of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope, GlideScope®, Airtraq®, and video-optical intubation stylet in endotracheal intubation used by emergency doctors in simulated difficult airway intubation: A pilot study
    Li, Yu On
    Wong, Oi Fung
    Ko, Shing
    Ma, Hing Man
    Lit, Chau Hung Albert
    Shih, Yau Ngai
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (03) : 179 - 188
  • [40] Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study
    Nakanishi, Toshiyuki
    Sento, Yoshiki
    Kamimura, Yuji
    Sobue, Kazuya
    JA CLINICAL REPORTS, 2021, 7 (01)