Bayesian Inversion for Surface Magnetic Resonance Tomography Based on Geostatistics

被引:4
|
作者
Jiang, Chuandong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yunzhi [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Ruixin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qi [3 ]
Shang, Xinlei [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Baofeng [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Qingming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Geophys Ical Explorat Equipment, Minist Educ China, Coll Instrumentat & Elect Engn, Changchun 130061, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Natl Geophys Explorat Equipment Engn Res Ctr, Changchun 130061, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Coll Commun Engn, Changchun 130061, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2022年 / 60卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bayesian inversion; geostatistics; groundwater; hydraulic conductivity; magnetic resonance tomography (MRT); Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); QT INVERSION; UNCERTAINTY; RESOLUTION; PARAMETER;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2022.3213857
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) has the advantages of direct, quantitative, and unique interpretation in the field of groundwater detection. Currently, the inversion of MRT data primarily uses the Q-time (QT) inversion method based on the Tikhonov regularization. However, when the heterogeneity of an aquifer is high and the water content distribution is markedly uneven, this method removes many details in the model and cannot perform uncertainty analysis on the results. To solve these problems, we propose a Bayesian inversion for MRT data based on geostatistics. The method uses previously known geological data, such as drilling, to determine prior information models containing variograms and mixture Gaussian probability distributions for generating many stochastic realizations. Under the Bayesian framework, a modified Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) strategy is used to obtain the posterior probability distributions of subsurface aquifers and hydraulic conductivity, and the results of quantitative uncertainty analysis. By comparing the inversion performance for simulated models, the imaging result of the Bayesian method is found to be markedly more accurate than that of the QT method for subsurface 2-D aquifers, particularly in explaining the stochastic model (i.e., the water-bearing model with an uneven distribution of water content). This method can also intuitively quantify the uncertainty of the imaging results, which mitigates the shortcomings of existing inversion methods. This article also discusses the effects of prior information, number of chains, and noise levels on the results and also validates the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method using field-measured data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty quantification in electrical resistivity tomography inversion: hybridizing block-wise bootstrapping with geostatistics
    Khabaz, Zahra Tafaghod
    Ghanati, Reza
    Berube, Charles L.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 239 (03) : 1576 - 1596
  • [22] Inversion of resistivity in Magnetic Resonance Sounding
    Braun, Martina
    Yaramanci, Ugur
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 66 (3-4) : 151 - 164
  • [23] Inversion of Magnetic Resonance Sounding data
    Yaramanci, U.
    Hertrich, M.
    BOLETIN GEOLOGICO Y MINERO, 2007, 118 (03): : 473 - 488
  • [24] Multifrequency inversion in magnetic resonance elastography
    Papazoglou, Sebastian
    Hirsch, Sebastian
    Braun, Juergen
    Sack, Ingolf
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (08): : 2329 - 2346
  • [25] Inversion analysis for magnetic resonance elastography
    Nakamura, Gen
    Jiang, Yu
    Nagayasu, Sei
    Cheng, Jin
    APPLICABLE ANALYSIS, 2008, 87 (02) : 165 - 179
  • [26] Inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance echo data based on maximum entropy
    Zou, Youlong
    Xie, Ranhong
    Ding, Yejiao
    Arad, Alon
    GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 81 (01) : D1 - D8
  • [27] Origin-destination network tomography with Bayesian inversion approach
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, (WI 2006 Main Conference Proceedings), 2006, : 38 - 41
  • [29] Spectroscopy in magnetic resonance tomography
    Verkhoglazova, E. V.
    Kupriyanov, D. A.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 958 : 284 - 285
  • [30] Coupled magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity tomography: An open-source toolbox for surface nuclear-magnetic resonance
    Skibbe, Nico
    Rochlitz, Raphael
    Guenther, Thomas
    Mueller-Petke, Mike
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (03) : F52 - F63