Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices

被引:39
|
作者
Hudson, N. [1 ,2 ]
Ayoko, G. A. [1 ]
Dunlop, M. [2 ]
Duperouzel, D. [2 ]
Burrell, D. [2 ]
Bell, K. [2 ]
Gallagher, E. [2 ]
Nicholas, P. [3 ]
Heinrich, N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Phys & Chem Sci, Int Lab Air Qual & Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Dept Primary Ind & Fisheries Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[3] FSA Consulting, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
Odour; Emission rate; Sampling; Device; CATTLE FEEDLOTS; AREAL SURFACES; COVERS; SYSTEM; PONDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.043
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Two commonly used sampling devices (a wind tunnel and the US EPA dynamic emission chamber), were used to collect paired samples of odorous air from a number of agricultural odour sources. The odour samples were assessed using triangular, forced-choice dynamic olfactometry. The odour concentration data was combined with the flushing rate data to calculate odour emission rates for both devices on all sources. Odour concentrations were consistently higher in samples collected with a flux chamber (ratio ranging from 10:7 to 5:1, relative to wind tunnel samples), whereas odour emission rates were consistently larger when derived from wind tunnels (ratio ranging from 60:1 to 240:1, relative to flux chamber values). A complex relationship existed between emission rate estimates derived from each device, apparently influenced by the nature of the emitting surface. These results have great significance for users of odour dispersion models, for which an odour emission rate is a key input parameter. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 124
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of blood specimen quality from two sampling devices for umbilical arterial catheters
    Knott, K
    Bowling, F
    Flenady, V
    Liley, H
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (04) : 311A - 311A
  • [22] Identification of an odour source from various probable sources in an industrial wastewater treatment plant
    Habip, M
    Tripathi, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL ODOUR MANAGEMENT: ODOUR EMISSION - ODOUR NUISANCE - OLFACTOMETRY - ELECTRONIC SENSORS - ODOUR ABATEMENT, 2004, 1850 : 453 - 462
  • [23] COMPARISON OF RESTING METABOLIC RATES MEASURED WITH TWO DIFFERENT METHODS
    Ucok, Kagan
    Mollaoglu, Hakan
    Akgun, Lutfi
    Genc, Abdurrahman
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 59 : 462 - 462
  • [24] Comparison of emission spectra from various light sources: A physical chemistry education outreach project
    Steen, April
    Scott, Kerri
    Hammer, Nathan
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [25] Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources
    Park, K. S.
    Seo, Y. C.
    Lee, S. J.
    Lee, J. H.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 180 (1-2) : 151 - 156
  • [26] Comparison of simulated and measured light emission spectra from solid state incandescent light emitting devices
    Shukla, Abhinav
    Kuo, Yue
    Kuo, Tyler W.
    MRS ADVANCES, 2020, 5 (39) : 2033 - 2041
  • [27] Comparison of simulated and measured light emission spectra from solid state incandescent light emitting devices
    Abhinav Shukla
    Yue Kuo
    Tyler W. Kuo
    MRS Advances, 2020, 5 : 2033 - 2041
  • [28] Solid Sampling in Analysis of Various Plants Using Two-Jet Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry
    Zaksas, Natalia P.
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2019, 73 (08) : 870 - 878
  • [29] COMPARISON OF MEASURED AURORAL EMISSION WITH THAT CALCULATED FROM A MEASURED ELECTRON FLUX
    ANDERSON, HR
    ROMICK, G
    REES, MH
    PAZICH, PM
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1973, 54 (11): : 1171 - 1171
  • [30] Comparison of Two Devices and Two Breathing Patterns for Exhaled Breath Condensate Sampling
    Huettmann, Eva-Maria
    Greulich, Timm
    Hattesohl, Akira
    Schmid, Severin
    Noeske, Sarah
    Herr, Christian
    John, Gerrit
    Joerres, Rudolf A.
    Mueller, Bernd
    Vogelmeier, Claus
    Koczulla, Andreas Rembert
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):