Concurrent Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Term Premature Rupture of Membranes A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:17
|
作者
Tan, Peng Chiong [1 ]
Daud, Siti Aishah [1 ]
Omar, Siti Zawiah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2009年 / 113卷 / 05期
关键词
INTRACERVICAL GEL; PROSTAGLANDIN E-2; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; VAGINAL INSERT; RECEPTORS; DESENSITIZATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1f605
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of concurrent vaginal dinoprostone and oxytocin infusion against oxytocin infusion for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes (PROM) on vaginal delivery within 12 hours and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Nulliparas with uncomplicated PROM at term, a Bishop score less than or equal to 6, and who required labor induction were recruited for a double-blind randomized trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 3-mg dinoprostone pessary and oxytocin infusion or placebo and oxytocin infusion. A cardiotocogram was performed before induction and maintained to delivery. Dinoprostone pessary or placebo was placed in the posterior vaginal fornix. Oxytocin intravenous infusion was commenced at 2 milliunits/min and doubled every 30 minutes to a maximum of 32 milliunits/min. Oxytocin infusion rate was titrated to achieve four contractions every 10 minutes. Primary outcomes were vaginal delivery within 12 hours and maternal satisfaction with the birth process using a visual analog scale WAS) from 0 to 10 (higher score, greater satisfaction). RESULTS: One hundred fourteen women were available for analysis. Vaginal delivery rates within 12 hours were 25 of 57 (43.9%) for concurrent treatment compared with 27/57 (47.4%) (relative risk 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.6-1.4, P = .85) for oxytocin only; median VAS was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) compared with 8 (IQR 2), P = .38. Uterine hyperstimulation was 14% compared with 5.3%, P = .20; overall vaginal delivery rates were 59.6% compared with 64.9%, P = .70; and induction to vaginal delivery interval 9.7 hours compared with 9.4 hours P = .75 for concurrent treatment compared with oxytocin, respectively. There was no significant difference for any other outcome. CONCLUSION: Concurrent vaginal dinoprostone and intravenous oxytocin for labor induction of term PROM did not expedite delivery or improve patient satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN74376345
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1065
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women with Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ahmed, Rania Hassan Mostafa
    Sweed, Mohamed Samir Eid
    El-Bishry, Gasser Adly
    Hassan, Raghda Khaled
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (12) : 3507 - 3514
  • [22] Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women with Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Rania Hassan Mostafa Ahmed
    Mohamed Samir Eid Sweed
    Gasser Adly El-Bishry
    Raghda Khaled Hassan
    Reproductive Sciences, 2023, 30 : 3507 - 3514
  • [23] Induction of labor at term using isosorbide mononitrate simultaneously with dinoprostone compared to dinoprostone treatment alone:: A randomized, controlled trial
    Wolfler, Monika M.
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    Venturini, Paolo
    Huber, Ambros
    Helmer, Hanns
    Husslein, Peter
    Tschugguel, Walter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : 1617 - 1622
  • [24] Labor Induction for Premature Rupture of Membranes Using Vaginal Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
    Abraham, Cynthia
    Meirowitz, Natalie
    Kohn, Nina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (03) : 181 - 185
  • [25] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [26] MANAGEMENT OF PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM - RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    NATALE, R
    MILNE, JK
    CAMPBELL, MK
    POTTS, PGG
    WEBSTER, K
    HALINDA, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) : 936 - 939
  • [27] Oral Misoprostol or vaginal Dinoprostone for labor induction? Randomized controlled trial
    Dallen-Bach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S108 - S108
  • [28] Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial
    Pourali, Leila
    Saghafi, Nafiseh
    Abadi, Saeed Eslami Hasan
    Tara, Fatemeh
    Vatanchi, Atieh Mohamadzadeh
    Motamedi, Elham
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 167 - 171
  • [29] Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Phloroglucinol in Combination with Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM)
    Yu, Jiazheng
    Chen, Lili
    Wang, Xia
    Li, Xiangzhi
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [30] Induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavorable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Levy, Roni
    Vaisbuch, Edi
    Furman, Boris
    Brown, Dov
    Volach, Vania
    Hagay, Zion J.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (02) : 126 - 129