A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production

被引:24
|
作者
Rahman, Wasel-Ur [1 ]
Patel, Madhumita [1 ,2 ]
Kurian, Vinoj [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Indian Sch Mines, Indian Inst Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Dhanbad, Bihar, India
关键词
Intermediate pyrolysis; Transportation fuels; Comparative techno-economic model; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Decentralized; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL PRODUCTION; COMBINED HEAT; JET FUEL; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE LIQUID; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115877
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The conversion of municipal solid waste (MSW) to transportation fuels can be an attractive route to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation and municipal sectors. Thermochemical conversion routes like hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), fast pyrolysis (FP), and intermediate pyrolysis (IP) have been shown to be adept at converting organic dominant MSW into bio-crude or bio-oil. However, to produce compatible transportation grade fuels, it is necessary to upgrade the intermediate product (bio-crude or bio-oil) from all the processes, the extent of which differs depending on the process. Moreover, depending on the conversion technique, the production configuration can be either centralized or decentralized. In a centralized system, feed is transported to a facility to produce the intermediate and upgrade it (on-site upgrading), while in a decentralized system, the intermediate is produced elsewhere and transported to an upgrading facility (off-site upgrading).. Four scenarios were developed and modeled to compare the cost of production of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from bio-crudes produced from HTL, FP, and IP.. The scenarios are: 1) a centralized HTL plant (C-HTL); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 2) a centralized FP plant (C-FP); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 3) a decentralized FP plant (D-FP); 50 dry t per day; off-site upgrading, and 4) a decentralized IP plant; 12 dry t per day; off-site upgrading.. Jet fuel was the primary fuel for comparison and the production costs were calculated to be $ 0.72, $ 0.85, $ 1.04, and $ 0.81 per liter for the C-HTL, the C-FP, the D-FP, and the D-IP plants, respectively. Secondary products (gasoline and diesel) can be produced alongside in cost ranges of $ 0.97 - $ 1.40 per liter and $ 1.02 - $ 1.47 per liter, respectively. The information conveyed in this study helps to identify the potential of thermochemical conversion processes to produce transportation fuels at competitive prices. The critical barriers to adopt such large-scale production processes and the opportunities of small-scale decentralized production are also mentioned. The outcomes of this study can be used to direct research and investment to address the major roadblocks that are slowing the extensive development of these technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Techno-economic analysis of levoglucosan production via fast pyrolysis of cotton straw in China
    Wang, Junqi
    Lu, Zhoumin
    Shah, Ajay
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2019, 13 (04): : 1085 - 1097
  • [42] Sustainable chemical recycling of waste plastics into olefins through low-pressure hydrothermal liquefaction and microwave pyrolysis: Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment
    Lee, Seyeong
    Lee, Hyejeong
    Lee, Jaewon
    Cho, Hyungtae
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 317
  • [43] Utilization of eucalyptus for electricity production in Brazil via fast pyrolysis: A techno-economic analysis
    Pighinelli, Anna L. M. T.
    Schaffer, Mark A.
    Boateng, Akwasi A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 119 : 590 - 597
  • [44] Techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis for the valorization of short rotation coppice cultivated for phytoextraction
    Kuppens, Tom
    Van Dael, Miet
    Vanreppelen, Kenny
    Thewys, Theo
    Yperman, Jan
    Carleer, Robert
    Schreurs, Sonja
    Van Passel, Steven
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 88 : 336 - 344
  • [45] A Techno-Economic Assessment of Syngas Production by Plasma Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste as a Substitute Gaseous Fuel
    Montiel-Bohorquez, Nestor D.
    Saldarriaga-Loaiza, Juan D.
    Perez, Juan F.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (09):
  • [46] Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of in situ and ex situ fast pyrolysis for biofuel production
    Li, Boyan
    Ou, Longwen
    Dang, Qi
    Meyer, Pimphan
    Jones, Susanne
    Brown, Robert
    Wright, Mark
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 49 - 56
  • [47] A techno-economic analysis of energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW) by an integrated intermediate pyrolysis and combined heat and power (CHP) plant
    Yang, Y.
    Wang, J.
    Chong, K.
    Bridgwater, A. V.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 174 : 406 - 416
  • [48] On-site hydrogen production from transportation fuels: An overview and techno-economic assessment
    Katikaneni, Sai P.
    Al-Muhaish, Fahad
    Harale, Aadesh
    Pham, Thang V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (09) : 4331 - 4350
  • [49] A comparative techno-economic assessment of biochar production from different residue streams using conventional and microwave pyrolysis
    Haeldermans, T.
    Campion, L.
    Kuppens, T.
    Vanreppelen, K.
    Cuypers, A.
    Schreurs, S.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 318
  • [50] Techno-Economic Analysis of the Production of Liquid Biofuels from Sewage Sludge via Hydrothermal Liquefaction
    Del Alamo, Gonzalo
    Bugge, Mette
    Pedersen, Thomas Helmer
    Rosendahl, Lasse
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (02) : 1131 - 1150