US DOE/NETL Core R&D Program for Carbon Storage Technology Development

被引:4
|
作者
Rodosta, Traci [1 ]
Ackiewicz, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Morgantown, WV 26507 USA
[2] US DOE, Washington, DC 20585 USA
关键词
US DOE Carbon Storage Program; National Energy Technology Laboratory; carbon capture and storage (CCS); geologic storage technologies; simulation and risk assessment; monitoring; verification; and accounting; carbon use and reuse; CO2; STORAGE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.672
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The Carbon Storage Program contains three principal components: Core Research and Development (R&D), Infrastructure, and Program Support (Strategic). Core R&D involves both applied laboratory-and pilot-scale research focused on adapting existing and developing new technologies and systems for geologic storage. Core R&D encompasses three Technology Areas: (1) Geologic Storage Technologies and Simulation and Risk Assessment (GSRA); (2) Monitoring, Verification, Accounting (MVA), and Assessment; and (3) Carbon Use and Reuse. The GSRA Technology Area is subdivided into six Key Technologies (wellbore; mitigation; fluid flow, pressure, and water management; geomechanical impacts; geochemical impacts; and risk assessment). The MVA Technology Area is subdivided into four Key Technologies (atmospheric monitoring; near-surface monitoring; subsurface monitoring; and intelligent monitoring). The Carbon Use and Reuse is subdivided into three Key Technologies (polycarbonate plastics, mineralization/cements, and chemicals). This paper addresses the Core R&D geologic storage effort and how it is meeting the R&D challenges in the GSRA and MVA Technology Areas. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6368 / 6378
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] US PERSPECTIVE ON THE ITER MAGNETICS R&D PROGRAM
    Montgomery, D. Bruce
    Thome, Richard J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 1993, 3 (01) : 342 - 349
  • [22] A Technology Development Matrix for Carbon Capture: Technology Status and R&D Gap Assessment
    Baker, Ryan
    Alizadeh Sahraei, Ommolbanin
    Dal-Cin, Mauro Mario
    Bensebaa, Farid
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [23] US DOE/NETL large pilot-scale testing of advanced carbon capture technologies
    Brickett, Lynn
    Munson, Ron
    Litynski, John
    FUEL, 2020, 268
  • [24] Strategies for driving R&D and technology development
    Talonen, Tapani
    Hakkarainen, Karl
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (05) : 54 - 60
  • [25] DOE breaks traditional R&D mold
    Verseput, R
    R&D MAGAZINE, 1998, 40 (05): : 60 - 63
  • [26] DOE AWARDS SOLAR R&D GRANTS
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2010, 88 (20) : 24 - 24
  • [27] DOE, DOD TO JOIN ON BATTERY R&D
    Johnson, Jeff
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2011, 89 (10) : 32 - 32
  • [28] R&D Needs for a US Fusion Magnet Base Program
    Zhai, Yuhu
    Larbalestier, David
    Duckworth, Robert
    Hartwig, Zachary
    Prestemon, Soren
    Forest, Cary
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2024, 34 (05) : 1 - 5
  • [29] R&D program can fix US voting problem
    Papadakis, EP
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 2001, 34 (04) : 10 - 10
  • [30] DOE PLANS SHIFT IN R&D DIRECTION
    Johnson, Jeff
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2011, 89 (40) : 9 - 9