Systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction models for adults undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery

被引:15
|
作者
Reilly, Jennifer R. [1 ,2 ]
Gabbe, Belinda J. [3 ]
Brown, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Hodgson, Carol L. [3 ]
Myles, Paul S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Dept Anaesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Alfred Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
anaesthesia; mortality; outcome; perioperative; risk; risk prediction; surgery; PHYSICAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; P-POSSUM; PREOPERATIVE SCORE; PORTSMOUTH POSSUM; SURGICAL QUALITY; LABORATORY DATA;
D O I
10.1111/ans.16255
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Risk prediction tools can be used in the perioperative setting to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from increased surveillance and monitoring in the postoperative period, to aid shared decision-making, and to benchmark risk-adjusted hospital performance. We evaluated perioperative risk prediction tools relevant to an Australian context. Methods A systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction tools used for adults undergoing inpatient noncardiac surgery, published between 2011 and 2019 (following an earlier systematic review). We searched Medline via OVID using medical subject headings consistent with the three main areas of risk, surgery and mortality/morbidity. A similar search was conducted in Embase. Tools predicting morbidity but not mortality were excluded, as were those predicting a composite outcome that did not report predictive performance for mortality separately. Tools were also excluded if they were specifically designed for use in cardiac or other highly specialized surgery, emergency surgery, paediatrics or elderly patients. Results Literature search identified 2568 studies for screening, of which 19 studies identified 21 risk prediction tools for inclusion. Conclusion Four tools are candidates for adapting in the Australian context, including the Surgical Mortality Probability Model (SMPM), Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM), Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) and NZRISK. SORT has similar predictive performance to POSPOM, using only six variables instead of 17, contains all variables of the SMPM, and the original model developed in the UK has already been successfully adapted in New Zealand as NZRISK. Collecting the SORT and NZRISK variables in a national surgical outcomes study in Australia would present an opportunity to simultaneously investigate three of our four shortlisted models and to develop a locally valid perioperative mortality risk prediction model with high predictive performance.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 870
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] RISK MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF CARDIAC AND NON-CARDIAC MORTALITY FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Spoon, Daniel B.
    Singh, Mandeep
    Lennon, Ryan
    Rihal, Charanjit
    Gulati, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1702 - A1702
  • [23] β-Blockade in the perioperative management of the patient with cardiac disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery
    Flynn, B. C.
    Vernick, W. J.
    Ellis, J. E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 : 3 - 15
  • [25] Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery following coronary stent placement: a systematic review
    Childers, Christopher P.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    Ulloa, Jesus G.
    MacQueen, Ian T.
    Miake-Lye, Isomi M.
    Shanman, Roberta
    Mak, Selene
    Beroes, Jessica M.
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [26] Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery following coronary stent placement: a systematic review
    Christopher P. Childers
    Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
    Jesus G. Ulloa
    Ian T. MacQueen
    Isomi M. Miake-Lye
    Roberta Shanman
    Selene Mak
    Jessica M. Beroes
    Paul G. Shekelle
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [27] Perioperative Hyperglycemia and Mortality Risk in Non-Cardiac Surgical Patients
    Frisch, Anna
    Lin, Erica
    Gatcliffe, Chelsea
    Hudson, Megan
    Peng, Limin
    Mendoza, Jose
    Johnson, Rachel
    Rizzo, Monica
    Smiley, Dawn
    Umpierrez, Guillermo
    DIABETES, 2009, 58 : A27 - A27
  • [28] Perioperative myocardial necrosis in patients at high cardiovascular risk undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery
    Alcock, Richard F.
    Kouzios, Dorothy
    Naoum, Christopher
    Hillis, Graham S.
    Brieger, David B.
    HEART, 2012, 98 (10) : 792 - 798
  • [29] Perioperative outcomes of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing non-cardiac surgery
    Dhillon, Ashwat
    Khanna, Ashish
    Randhawa, Mandeep Singh
    Cywinski, Jacek
    Saager, Leif
    Thamilarasan, Maran
    Lever, Harry M.
    Desai, Milind Y.
    HEART, 2016, 102 (20) : 1627 - 1632
  • [30] Perioperative care of heart transplant recipients undergoing non-cardiac surgery
    Navas-Blanco, Jose R.
    Modak, Raj K.
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 24 (02) : 140 - 148