Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energy integration: A southern India focus

被引:64
|
作者
Vishnupriyan, J. [1 ]
Manoharan, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thiagarajar Coll Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Madurai 625015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Renewable energy system; Demand side management; HOMER; Analytic hierarchy process; Multi-criteria decision analysis; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; SYSTEM; ALTERNATIVES; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; ZONES; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent days, sustainability is considered as an important mechanism due to contemporary increase in demands and worldwide limited resources. This paper presents the possibility of integrating a renewable energy system with an existing grid to meet electrical energy demand of institutional buildings located in Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Currently, the Tamil Nadu state electric-grid power is not surplus and experiencing 40% short fall in generation. In this present paper a modern approach for the optimum planning of electric power system (EPS) is proposed based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). An intertwined analysis on energy management and techno-economic optimization of grid connected renewable energy system is proposed. The prospects of different fixed tilt solar panels and peak load shifting based energy management are performed through HOMER Energy simulation. The AHP multi criteria decision analysis reveals that annual optimum tilt grid connected photovoltaic system is the optimum configuration for study location. The effectiveness of the AHP approach is evaluated with best worst method and stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis for prioritizing the renewable energy system options in order to select best EPS. In addition, the optimum configuration is implemented in the institutional buildings and performance is analyzed under varying climatic conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 488
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating renewable energy technologies to support building trigeneration - A multi-criteria analysis
    Chua, K. J.
    Yang, W. M.
    Wong, T. Z.
    Ho, C. A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 41 : 358 - 367
  • [32] Multi-Criteria Analysis to Select Renewable Energy Solution for District Heating System
    Polikarpova, Ilze
    Lauka, Dace
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Vigants, Edgars
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 23 (03) : 101 - 109
  • [34] Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods in Renewable Energy Development: A Review
    Kamari, M. L.
    Isvand, H.
    Nazari, M. A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 1 (01): : 47 - 54
  • [35] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review
    Siksnelyte-Butkiene, Indre
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [36] Sustainability indicator of renewable energy system based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods
    Liu, Gang
    Rasul, M. G.
    Amanullah, M. T. O.
    Khan, M. M. K.
    NATURAL RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-3, 2012, 361-363 : 1263 - 1273
  • [37] An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources
    Celikbilek, Yakup
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 1246 - 1258
  • [38] Site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Bao, Minghan
    Arzaghi, Ehsan
    Abaei, Mohammad Mahdi
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Garaniya, Vikram
    Abdussamie, Nagi
    Heasman, Kevin
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 229
  • [39] Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method
    San Cristobal, J. R.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) : 498 - 502
  • [40] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Zhao, Jun-Hong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09): : 2263 - 2278