Costs and benefits of routine follow-up after curative treatment for endometrial cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Agboola, OO
Grunfeld, E
Coyle, D
Perry, GA
机构
[1] UNIV OTTAWA, DEPT RADIOL, OTTAWA, ON, CANADA
[2] NATL CANC INST CANADA, OTTAWA, ON, CANADA
[3] OTTAWA CIVIC HOSP, LOEB RES INST, CRITICAL EPIDEMIOL UNIT, OTTAWA, ON K1Y 4E9, CANADA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the costs of routine outpatient follow-up after curative treatment of endometrial cancer, and to determine whether this leads to early detection of recurrence or survival. The impact of specific disease characteristics on survival is examined. Design: Retrospective chart review, and calculation of costs. Setting: Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre-Civic Division (ORCC-C). Patients: All 432 patients referred to the ORCC-C with endometrial cancer between 1982 and 1991 who received treatment with curative intent and who continued with routine follow-up. Results: Cancer recurred in 50 patients (11.57%). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrences, or between those with recurrences detected during routine follow-up visits or in the interval between routine visits. Of 4830 Papanicolaou (Pap) smears performed routinely, cancer was detected in 6 cases. The mean cost of the routine follow-up procedures for each patient with a recurrence was $19 200. Conclusion: Intensive follow-up of women with endometrial cancer does not result in improved survival. A prospective randomized study is warranted to evaluate other potential benefits of follow-up, such as improved quality of life or decreased morbidity. There is no economic or clinical justification for the routine use of the Pap smear in the follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer. The potential benefits of routine follow-up in endometrial cancer and other types of cancer with favourable prognoses warrant critical evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 886
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patients' view of routine follow-up after gynecological cancer treatment
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Lahousen, Manfred
    Dorfer, Martha
    Lambauer, Michaela
    Lang, Uwe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 159 (01) : 180 - 183
  • [22] Patients' view of routine follow-up after breast cancer treatment
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Dorfer, Martha
    Tamussino, Karl
    Greimel, Elfriede
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2017, 129 (21-22) : 810 - 815
  • [23] IMPROVING THE QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF FOLLOW-UP AFTER CURATIVE TREATMENT FOR BREAST CANCER
    Kimman, M.
    Dirksen, C.
    Lambin, P.
    Boersma, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S113 - S114
  • [24] Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative lung cancer treatment
    Virgo, KS
    Naunheim, KS
    McKirgan, LW
    Kissling, ME
    Lin, JC
    Johnson, FE
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 112 (02): : 356 - 363
  • [25] WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF ROUTINE BREAST-CANCER FOLLOW-UP
    MORRIS, S
    CORDER, AP
    TAYLOR, I
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 68 (805) : 904 - 907
  • [26] Costs of follow-up after potentially curative treatment for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma
    Goel, A
    Christy, MEL
    Virgo, KS
    Kraybill, WG
    Johnson, FE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 25 (02) : 429 - 435
  • [28] Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery: is routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging worthwile?
    Titu, L
    Breen, DJ
    Hartley, J
    Nicholson, AA
    Drew, PJ
    Monson, JR
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (01) : S76 - S77
  • [29] Evaluation of routine image follow-up in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer after curative surgical resection.
    Diniz, Lara Azevedo
    Karani, Amanda
    Sales, Diogo De Brito
    Machado, Larissa
    Barros, Milton Jose
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (04)
  • [30] Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with ''curative'' surgery for colorectal cancer
    Bergamaschi, R
    Arnaud, JP
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 3 (05) : 464 - 469