Greenhouse gas emission intensities and economic efficiency in crop production: A systems analysis of 95 farms

被引:37
|
作者
Bonesmo, Helge [1 ]
Skjelvag, Arne Oddvar [2 ]
Janzen, H. Henry [3 ]
Klakegg, Ove [4 ]
Tveito, Ole Einar [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Agr Econ Res Inst, NO-7468 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, NO-1432 As, Norway
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[4] Norwegian Forest & Landscape Inst, NO-1431 As, Norway
[5] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Farm scale; Crop production; Soil C; Soil N2O; Stochastic simulation; Profitability; SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER; NORTHEASTERN COLORADO; WHEAT PRODUCTION; NITROUS-OXIDE; N2O EMISSIONS; MODEL; CARBON; VARIABILITY; NORWAY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2012.04.001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To increase food production while mitigating climate change, cropping systems in the future will need to reduce greenhouse gas emission per unit of production. We conducted an analysis of 95 arable farms in Norway to calculate farm scale emissions of greenhouse gases, expressed both as CO2 eq per unit area, and CO2 eq per kg DM produced and to describe relationships between the farms' GHG intensities and heir economic efficiencies (gross margin). The study included: (1) design of a farm scale model for net GHG emission from crop production systems; (2) establishing a consistent farm scale data set for the farms with required soil, weather, and farm operation data; (3) a stochastic simulation of the variation in the sources of GHG emission intensities, and sensitivity analysis of selected parameters and equations on GHG emission intensities; and (4) describing relationships between GHG emission intensities and gross margins on farms. Among small seed and grain crops the variation in GHG emissions per kg DM was highest in oilseed (emission intensity at the 75th percentile level was 1.9 times higher than at the 25th percentile). For barley, oats, spring wheat, and winter wheat, emissions per kg DM at the 75th percentile levels were between 1.4 and 1.6 times higher than those at the 25th percentiles. Similar trends were observed for emissions per unit land area. Invariably soil N2O emission was the largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for almost half of the emissions. The second largest source was the off farm manufacturing of inputs (similar to 25%). Except for the oilseed crop, in which soil carbon (C) change contributed least, the on farm emissions due to fuel use contributed least to the total GHG intensities (similar to 10%). The soil C change contributed most to the variability in GHG emission intensities among farms in all crops, and among the sensitivity elasticities the highest one was related to environmental impacts on soil C change. The high variation in GHG intensities evident in our study implies the potential for significant mitigation of GHG emissions. The GHG emissions per kg DM (intensity) decreased with increasing gross margin in grain and oilseed crops, suggesting that crop producers have economic incentives to reduce GHG emissions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Straw Retention on Crop Yield, Soil Properties, Water Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission in China: A Meta-Analysis
    Peng Liu
    Jin He
    Hongwen Li
    Qingjie Wang
    Caiyun Lu
    Kan Zheng
    Wenzheng Liu
    Hongbo Zhao
    Shangyi Lou
    International Journal of Plant Production, 2019, 13 : 347 - 367
  • [42] Effect of Straw Retention on Crop Yield, Soil Properties, Water Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission in China: A Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Peng
    He, Jin
    Li, Hongwen
    Wang, Qingjie
    Lu, Caiyun
    Zheng, Kan
    Liu, Wenzheng
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Lou, Shangyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2019, 13 (04) : 347 - 367
  • [43] Crop establishment and nitrogen management affect greenhouse gas emission and biological activity in tropical rice production
    Mohanty, Sangita
    Swain, C. K.
    Sethi, S. K.
    Dalai, P. C.
    Bhattachrayya, P.
    Kumar, Anjani
    Tripathi, Rahul
    Shahid, M.
    Panda, B. B.
    Kumar, U.
    Lal, B.
    Gautam, P.
    Munda, S.
    Nayak, A. K.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 104 : 80 - 98
  • [44] Life cycle energy use, costs, and greenhouse gas emission of broiler farms in different production systems in Iran—a case study of Alborz province
    Seyyed Hassan Pishgar-Komleh
    Asadollah Akram
    Alireza Keyhani
    Rosalie van Zelm
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 16041 - 16049
  • [45] Analysis of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Rainfed Canola Production (Case study: Canakkale Province, Turkey)
    Ozpinar, Sakine
    JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 20 (01): : 197 - 210
  • [46] Economic performance and efficiency determinants of crop-producing farms in Norway
    Alem, Habtamu
    Lien, Gudbrand
    Hardaker, J. Brian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 67 (09) : 1418 - 1434
  • [47] Applying data envelopment analysis approach to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG (greenhouse gas) emission of wheat production
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Omid, Mahmoud
    Mousazadeh, Hossein
    ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 588 - 593
  • [48] Energy Usage, Greenhouse Gas Emission and Economic Analysis of Sour Cherry Production in Türkiye: The Case of Isparta Province
    Sari, Fatih
    Gokdogan, Osman
    APPLIED FRUIT SCIENCE, 2024, 66 (06) : 2221 - 2229
  • [49] Economic and stochastic efficiency analysis of alternative cover crop systems in Louisiana
    Wang, Hua
    Adusumilli, Naveen
    Gentry, Donna
    Fultz, Lisa
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2020, 56 (05) : 651 - 661
  • [50] Exploring Crop Production Strategies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Based on Scenario Analysis
    Gu, Zhuoyuan
    Xue, Jing
    Han, Hongfang
    Wang, Chao
    LAND, 2025, 14 (02)