Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization

被引:190
|
作者
Hillis, SD [1 ]
Marchbanks, PA [1 ]
Tylor, LR [1 ]
Peterson, HB [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, DRH, NCCDPHP K34, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 1999年 / 93卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00539-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the cumulative probability of regret after tubal sterilization, and to identify risk factors for regret that are identifiable before sterilization. Methods: We used a prospective, multicenter cohort study to evaluate the cumulative probability of regret within 14 years after tubal sterilization. Participants included 11,232 women aged 18-44 years who had tubal sterilizations between 1978 and 1987. Actuarial life tables and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify those groups at greatest risk of experiencing regret. Results: The cumulative probability of expressing regret during a follow-up interview within 14 years after tubal sterilization was 20.3% for women aged 30 or younger at the time of sterilization and 5.9% for women over age 30 at sterilization (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 2.3). For the former group, the cumulative probability of regret was similar for women sterilized during the postpartum period (after cesarean, 20.3%, 95% CI 14.5, 26.0; after vaginal delivery, 23.7%, 95% CI 17.6, 29.8) and for women sterilized within 1 year after the birth of their youngest child (22.3%, 95% CI 16.4, 28.2). For women aged 30 or younger at sterilization, the cumulative probability of regret decreased as time since the birth of the youngest child increased (2-3 years, 16.2%, 95% CI 11.4, 21.0; 4-7 years, 11.3%, 95% CI 7.8, 14.8; 8 or more years, 8.3%, 95% CI 5.1, 11.4) and was lowest among women who had no previous births (6.3%, 95% CI 3.1, 9.4). Conclusion: Although most women expressed no regret after tubal sterilization, women 30 years of age and younger at the time of sterilization had an increased probability of expressing regret during follow-up interviews within 14 years after the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 895
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eugenic Sterilization in the United States Its Present Status
    Brown, Frederick W.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1930, 149 : 22 - 35
  • [42] Breeding contempt: The history of coerced sterilization in the United States
    Larson, Edward J.
    ISIS, 2008, 99 (03) : 601 - 602
  • [43] Breeding contempt: The history of coerced sterilization in the United States
    Kline, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2008, 63 (04) : 537 - 539
  • [44] CURRENT STATUS OF ELECTIVE STERILIZATION IN UNITED-STATES
    HULKA, JF
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1977, 28 (05) : 515 - 520
  • [45] Breeding Contempt: The History of Coerced Sterilization in the United States
    Dalsgard, Anne Line
    MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2009, 23 (04) : 504 - 505
  • [46] Tubal Sterilization and Cervical Cancer Underscreening in the United States
    Holt, Hunter K.
    Martinez, Gladys
    Reyes, Maria F.
    Saraiya, Mona
    Qin, Jin
    Sawaya, George F.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 33 (06) : 729 - 733
  • [47] Tubal Sterilization and Cervical Cancer Underscreening in the United States
    Holt, Hunter K.
    Martinez, Gladys
    Reyes, Maria F.
    Saraiya, Mona
    Qin, Jin
    Sawaya, George F.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 32 (11) : A24 - A25
  • [48] MEDICAL AND CONTRACEPTIVE REASONS FOR STERILIZATION IN THE UNITED-STATES
    RINDFUSS, RR
    LIAO, FT
    STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1988, 19 (06) : 370 - 380
  • [49] STERILIZATION AND BIRTH-CONTROL IN THE UNITED-STATES
    SARDON, JP
    POPULATION, 1985, 40 (03): : 540 - 544
  • [50] Breeding Contempt: The History of Coerced Sterilization in the United States
    Lovett, Laura L.
    AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2009, 114 (03): : 776 - 777