Relationship of dose of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to the benefits of candesartan in the candesartan in heart failure:: Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Added trial

被引:38
|
作者
McMurray, JJV [1 ]
Young, JB
Dunlap, ME
Granger, CB
Hainer, J
Michelson, EL
Earle, S
Olofsson, B
Östergren, J
Yusuf, S
Swedberg, K
Pfeffer, MA
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Cardiol, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] VA Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[6] AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE USA
[7] AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
[8] Karolinska Univ, Hosp Solna, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] HGM McMaster Clin, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[10] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[11] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Whether an angiotensin receptor blocker is of benefit when added to a full dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in heart failure (HF) is uncertain. Methods The effect of candesartan, compared with placebo, in 2548 patients randomized in the CHARM-Added trial was analyzed according to (i) ACE inhibitor dose at baseline, (ii) ACE inhibitor dose during follow-up, and (iii) combination treatment with ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker at baseline. The main outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Results The benefit of candesartan was not modified by the dose of ACE inhibitor. In all patients (n = 2548), the candesartan/placebo hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome was 0.85 (95% Cl 0.75-0.96). In patients taking a guideline recommended dose of ACE inhibitor at baseline (n = 129 1), this HR was 0.79 (95% Cl 0.67-0.95; interaction P value .26). In patients taking a Food and Drug Administration-designated maximum dose of ACE inhibitor (n = 529), this HR was 0.75 (95% Cl 0.57-0.98; interaction P value .29). The benefit of candesartan was preserved in patients taking beta-blockers in addition to a higher dose of ACE inhibitor and in patients maintaining a high dose of ACE inhibitor throughout follow-up. Conclusions These clinical findings support the pharmacologic evidence that ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have distinct mechanisms of action and show that their combined use improves outcomes in patients with HF more than an evidence-based dose of ACE inhibitor alone.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 991
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incidence and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure - An analysis of the candesartan in heart failure - Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program
    Desai, AS
    Swedberg, K
    Mcmurray, JJV
    Granger, CB
    Yusut, S
    Young, JB
    Dunlap, ME
    Solomon, SD
    Hainer, JW
    Olotsson, B
    Michelson, EL
    Pfeffer, MA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 52A - 52A
  • [22] Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with angina and heart failure in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Programme
    Badar, Athar A.
    Perez-Moreno, Ana C.
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    Brunton, Alan P. T.
    Jhund, Pardeep S.
    Wong, Chih M.
    Solomon, Scott D.
    Granger, Christopher B.
    Yusuf, Salim
    Pfeffer, Marc A.
    Swedberg, Karl
    Gardner, Roy S.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    McMurray, John J. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [23] Factors precipitating heart failure hospitalisation: a novel analysis of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme
    Mcentegart, M.
    Yusuf, S.
    Pfeffer, M. A.
    Michelson, E. L.
    Ostergren, J.
    Granger, C. B.
    Swedberg, K.
    McMurray, J. J. V.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 : 280 - 280
  • [25] RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COSTS FOR CANDESARTAN IN HEART FAILURE: ASSESSMENT OF REDUCTION IN MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY (CHARM) PROGRAMME FOR THE AUSTRIAN SETTING
    Fruhwald, F. M.
    Vavrovsky, A. D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A379 - A379
  • [26] Candesartan improves functional class across a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure:: Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme (CHARM)
    McMurray, JJ
    Östergren, J
    Olofsson, B
    Granger, CB
    Michelson, E
    Young, JB
    Dunlap, M
    Yusuf, S
    Swedberg, K
    Pfeffer, MA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 206A - 206A
  • [27] Randomized trial of candesartan cilexetil in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure and a history of intolerance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
    Granger, CB
    Ertl, G
    Kuch, J
    Maggioni, AP
    McMurray, J
    Rouleau, JL
    Stevenson, LW
    Swedberg, K
    Young, J
    Yusuf, S
    Califf, RM
    Bart, BA
    Held, P
    Michelson, EL
    Sellers, MA
    Ohlin, G
    Sparapani, R
    Pfeffer, MA
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 139 (04) : 609 - 617
  • [28] Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program (vol 152, pg 84, 2006)
    Ducharme, A.
    Swedberg, K.
    Pfeffer, M.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 152 (02) : 354 - 354
  • [29] Candesartan improves outcome in patients with low ejection fraction heart failure, irrespective of background dose of ACE inhibitor: An analysis of the CHARM-added trial
    McMurray, JJ
    Young, JB
    Dunlap, ME
    Granger, CB
    Hainer, JW
    Michelson, EL
    Earle, S
    Olofsson, B
    Ostergren, J
    Yusuf, S
    Swedberg, K
    Pfeffer, MA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 52A - 52A
  • [30] Kardioprotektion durch Candesartan bei HerzinsuffizienzCHARM-overall-Teilauswertung (Candesartan in heart failure assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity)
    C. Tschöpe
    H. P. Schultheiss
    Der Internist, 2006, 47 : 1084 - 1086