Knowledge Acquisition and Representation Using Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning and Dynamic Adaptive Fuzzy Petri Nets

被引:79
|
作者
Liu, Hu-Chen [1 ]
Liu, Long [2 ]
Lin, Qing-Lian [3 ]
Liu, Nan [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Design & Innovat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Human Factors Engn & Prod Ergon, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Management, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
关键词
Evidential reasoning (ER) approach; expert systems; fuzzy Petri nets (FPNs); knowledge acquisition; DECISION-MAKING; EXPERT-SYSTEMS; FAILURE MODE; ALGORITHM; INFERENCE; NETWORKS; RULES;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2223671
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The two most important issues of expert systems are the acquisition of domain experts' professional knowledge and the representation and reasoning of the knowledge rules that have been identified. First, during expert knowledge acquisition processes, the domain expert panel often demonstrates different experience and knowledge from one another and produces different types of knowledge information such as complete and incomplete, precise and imprecise, and known and unknown because of its cross-functional and multidisciplinary nature. Second, as a promising tool for knowledge representation and reasoning, fuzzy Petri nets (FPNs) still suffer a couple of deficiencies. The parameters in current FPN models could not accurately represent the increasingly complex knowledge-based systems, and the rules in most existing knowledge inference frameworks could not be dynamically adjustable according to propositions' variation as human cognition and thinking. In this paper, we present a knowledge acquisition and representation approach using the fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and dynamic adaptive FPNs to solve the problems mentioned above. As is illustrated by the numerical example, the proposed approach can well capture experts' diversity experience, enhance the knowledge representation power, and reason the rule-based knowledge more intelligently.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1072
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pythagorean Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Large Group Context
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Xu, Dong-Hui
    Duan, Chun-Yan
    Xiong, Yun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (08): : 5261 - 5271
  • [22] Method of Dynamic Knowledge Representation and Learning Based on Fuzzy Petri Nets
    危胜军
    胡昌振
    孙明谦
    JournalofBeijingInstituteofTechnology, 2008, (01) : 41 - 45
  • [23] Picture Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Acquisition in Considering Conflicting Opinions
    Xu, Xue-Guo
    Shi, Hua
    Xu, Dong-Hui
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [24] A FUZZY PETRI NET FOR KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING
    GARG, ML
    AHSON, SI
    GUPTA, PV
    INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1991, 39 (03) : 165 - 171
  • [25] Weighted fuzzy reasoning using weighted fuzzy Petri nets
    Chen, SM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2002, 14 (02) : 386 - 397
  • [26] Fuzzy reasoning Petri nets
    Gao, MM
    Zhou, MC
    Huang, XG
    Wu, ZM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2003, 33 (03): : 314 - 324
  • [27] Fuzzy knowledge representation and reasoning using a generalized fuzzy petri net and a similarity measure
    Ming-Hu Ha
    Yan Li
    Xiao-Feng Wang
    Soft Computing, 2007, 11 : 323 - 327
  • [28] Fuzzy knowledge representation and reasoning using a generalized Fuzzy Petri Net and a similarity measure
    Ha, Ming-Hu
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Xiao-Feng
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2007, 11 (04) : 323 - 327
  • [29] Knowledge representation using high-level fuzzy Petri nets
    Shen, Victor R. L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2006, 36 (06): : 1220 - 1227
  • [30] Modeling fuzzy reasoning using High Level Fuzzy Petri Nets
    Scarpelli, H
    Gomide, F
    Pedrycz, W
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1996, 4 (01) : 61 - 85