WHAT ARE THE CORE FEATURES OF PSYCHOPATHY? A PROTOTYPICALITY ANALYSIS USING THE PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST-REVISED (PCL-R)

被引:18
|
作者
Verschuere, Bruno [1 ]
te Kaat, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
psychopathy; Psychopathy Checklist; prototypicality analysis; empathy; callous-unemotional; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; CONSTRUCT; COOKE;
D O I
10.1521/pedi_2019_33_396
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
What are the core features of psychopathy? Previous prototypicality analyses showed that many features were considered as highly proto-typical. The authors extend this work by using forced ranking to grasp which features are most important. Forensic mental health professionals ranked the 20 Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) items on their importance to psychopathy. Affective-interpersonal features were judged to be of greater importance than behavioral-lifestyle features. The most important items were callous/lack of empathy, conning/manipulative, and lack of remorse or guilt, which were deemed more important than nearly all other PCL-R features. The prototypicality ranking of the 20 PCL-R items by the forensic mental health professionals showed strong overlap (r =.64 to .86) with psychometric indices of item importance (network centrality, item-total correlation, and item response theory discrimination parameter). Taken together, these findings clarify the relative importance of PCL-R features to psychopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 419
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Psychopathy in Austria Psychometric Properties of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised
    Mokros, Andreas
    Habermeyer, Elmar
    Neumann, Craig S.
    Schilling, Frank
    Hare, Robert D.
    Eher, Reinhard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 30 (04) : 243 - 250
  • [22] Die deutsche Version der Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R): Eine Erwiderung auf Endres und Schwanengel
    Andreas Mokros
    Pia Hollerbach
    Joachim Nitschke
    Elmar Habermeyer
    Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 2019, 13 : 92 - 95
  • [23] A review and meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist and psychopathy checklist-revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness
    Salekin, RT
    Rogers, R
    Sewell, KW
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1996, 3 (03) : 203 - 215
  • [24] Comments on the German adaptation of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised
    Endres, Johann
    Schwanengel, M. Florian
    FORENSISCHE PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE KRIMINOLOGIE, 2019, 13 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [25] The validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in adversarial proceedings
    Campbell, Terence W.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE, 2006, 6 (04) : 43 - 53
  • [27] A multigroup item response theory analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised
    Bolt, DA
    Hare, RD
    Vitale, JE
    Newman, JP
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [28] A bifactor approach to modeling the structure of the psychopathy checklist-revised
    Patrick, Christopher J.
    Hicks, Brian M.
    Nichol, Penny E.
    Krueger, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2007, 21 (02) : 118 - 141
  • [29] A Statistical Consideration Regarding the Threshold of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised
    Balsis, Steve
    Busch, Alexander J.
    Wilfong, Kevin M.
    Newman, Joseph W.
    Edens, John F.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 99 (05) : 494 - 502
  • [30] Validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in male methadone patients
    Rutherford, MJ
    Alterman, AI
    Cacciola, JS
    McKay, JR
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1997, 44 (2-3) : 143 - 149