Measurement of low breath-alcohol concentrations: laboratory studies and field experience

被引:7
|
作者
Dubowski, KM
Essary, NA
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Forestry Sci Lab, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/23.6.386
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Recent federal rules and traffic law changes impose breath-alcohol thresholds of 0.02 and 0.04 g/210 L upon some classes of motor vehicle operators, such as juveniles and commercial vehicle operators. In federally regulated alcohol testing in the workplace, removal of covered workers from safety-sensitive duties, and other adverse actions, also occur at breath- alcohol concentrations (BrACs) of 0.02 and 0.04 g/210 L. We therefore studied performance of vapor-alcohol and breath-alcohol measurement at low alcohol concentrations in the laboratory and in the field, with current-generation evidential analyzers. We report here chiefly our field experience with evidential breath-alcohol testing of drinking drivers on paired breath samples using 62 Intoxilyzer 5000-D analyzers, for BrACs of 0-0.059 g/210 L. The data from 62 law enforcement breath-alcohol testing sites were collected and pooled, with BrACs recorded to three decimal places, and otherwise carried out under the standard Oklahoma evidential breath-alcohol testing protocol. For 2105 pooled simulator control tests at 0.06-0.13 g/210 L the mean ± SD of the differences between target and result were -0.001 p 0.0035 g/210 L and 0.003 ± 0.0023 g/210 L for signed and absolute differences, respectively (spans -0.016-0.010, 0.000-0.016). For 2078 paired duplicate breath-alcohol measurements with the Intoxilyzer 5000-D, the mean ± SD difference (BrAC 1 - BrAC 2) were 0.002 ± 0.0026 (span 0-0.020 g/210 L). Variability of breath-alcohol measurements was related inversely to the alcohol concentration. Ninety-nine percent prediction limits for paired BrAC measurements correspond to a 0.020 g/210 L maximum absolute difference, meeting the NSC/CAOD recommendation that paired breath-alcohol analysis results within 0.02 g/210 L shall be deemed to be in acceptable agreement. We conclude that the field system for breath-alcohol analysis studied by us can and does perform reliably and accurately at low BrACs.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breath alcohol concentrations of college students in field settings: Seasonal, temporal, and contextual patterns
    Clapp, John D.
    Johnson, Mark B.
    Shillington, Audrey M.
    Lange, James E.
    Voas, Robert B.
    JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, 2008, 69 (02) : 323 - 331
  • [23] Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation
    Kim, Doheon
    Shin, Dongmin
    Hwang, Jungho
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (08)
  • [24] Laboratory apparatus for fumigation with low concentrations of nicotine With studies on aphids
    Richardson, H
    Busbey, RL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1937, 30 : 576 - 582
  • [25] FIELD STUDIES OF SLEEP WAKE PATTERNS AND PERFORMANCE - A LABORATORY EXPERIENCE
    BROUGHTON, RJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1991, 45 (02): : 240 - 253
  • [28] A laboratory protocol for obtaining transdermal and breath alcohol biosensor data: Next steps toward collecting data in the field
    Wong, G. Y.
    Saldich, E. B.
    Walden, K. -R.
    Correa, M.
    Wang, C.
    Rosen, I. G.
    Luczak, S. E.
    ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 47 : 249 - 249
  • [29] Measurement of apixaban concentrations in real-world clinical and laboratory settings: the first Polish experience
    Goralczyk, Tadeusz
    Papuga-Szela, Elzbieta
    Zuk, Joanna
    Undas, Anetta
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2018, 128 (05): : 324 - 326
  • [30] A Combined Laboratory and Field Test of a Smartphone Breath Alcohol Device and Blood Alcohol Concentration Estimator to Facilitate Moderate Drinking Among Young Adults
    Leeman, Robert F.
    Berey, Benjamin L.
    Frohe, Tessa
    Rowland, Bonnie H. P.
    Martens, Matthew P.
    Fucito, Lisa M.
    Stellefson, Michael
    Nixon, Sara Jo
    O'Malley, Stephanie S.
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2022, 36 (06) : 710 - 723