Intraoperative verification of resection margins of maxillary malignancies by cone-beam computed tomography

被引:5
|
作者
Ivashchenko, O. [1 ,2 ]
Pouw, B. [1 ]
de Witt, J. K. [3 ]
Koudounarakis, E. [3 ]
Nijkamp, J. [1 ]
van Veen, R. L. P. [3 ]
Ruers, T. J. M. [1 ,4 ]
Karakullukcu, B. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherland Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 AA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherland Canc Inst, Dept Head & Neck Oncol & Surg, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Cone-beam CT; Maxilla; Neoplasm; Margins of Excision; Computer-Assisted Surgery; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; TUMOR VOLUME; C-ARM; SURGERY; CANCER; HEAD; DELINEATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.01.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Resection of maxillary cancer often results in incomplete excision because of the tumour's proximity to important structures such as the orbit. To deal with this problem we prospectively investigated the feasibility of intraoperative imaging during maxillectomy to verify the planned resection margins. In total, six patients diagnosed with maxillary cancer listed for maxillectomy were included, irrespective of the histological type of tumour. Before resection, an accurate intended resection volume was delineated on diagnostic images. At the end of the operation we took a cone-beam computed tomographic (CT) scan of the treated maxilla, after which the accuracy of the resection was quantitatively evaluated by comparing the preoperative resection plan and the images acquired intraoperatively, based on the anatomy. Further resection was then done if necessary and quantitatively evaluated with a second cone-beam CT scan. Postoperatively we compared the results of the scan with those of the histological examination. Of the six, two resections were reported pathologically as less than radical, each of which was detected by intraoperative CT and resulted in extensions of the original resections. The mean (SD) distance between the planned and the actual resection was 1.49 (2.78) mm This suggests that intraoperative cone-beam CT imaging is a promising way to make an adequate intraoperative assessment of planned surgical margins of maxillary tumours. This allows for intraoperative resection margins to be improved, possibly leading to a better prognosis for the patient. (C) 2019 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 181
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cone-beam computed tomography or conventional radiography for localising of maxillary impacted canines?Question: In patients with maxillary impacted canines is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography?
    Niloufar Amintavakoli
    Silvia Spivakovsky
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2018, 19 (1) : 22 - 23
  • [32] ENDODONTIC ANATOMY OF SECOND MAXILLARY PREMOLARS AND THEIR RELATION TO MAXILLARY SINUS AS INDICATED BY CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Nistor, Cristina Coralia
    Coculescu, Elena Claudia
    Dragomirescu, Anca Oana
    Suciu, Ioana
    Ionescu, Ecaterina
    Nicolcea, Luiza Maria
    Bratu, Dana-Cristina
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 16 (02): : 402 - 410
  • [33] Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging dose estimation and optimization: Need of daily cone-beam computed tomography
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    Dixit, Chandra K.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Bahl, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 470 - 474
  • [34] Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Altaweel, Alaa Abdelqader
    Sowairi, Sami Mohammed Saad
    Sapri, Ahmed Mohammed Saaduddin
    Saeedi, Sama Abdulelah
    Alamri, Asalah Hamad
    Alnobi, Albtoul Ahmed
    ALSharif, Maha Fahad
    Altokhi, Ahmed Mohsen A.
    Abbas, Hisham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 2022
  • [35] Sphenoid bone changes in rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
    Stepanko, Lucas S.
    Lagravere, Manuel O.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 46 (05) : 269 - 279
  • [36] Immediate implant placement in the premolar maxillary area: a cone-beam computed tomography study
    Najm, Ali
    Bihorac, Amer
    Machado, Vinicius de Carvalho
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2025, 55 (01): : 72 - 84
  • [37] Maxillary sinusitis as a diagnostical adverse finding of the dental cone-beam computed tomography study
    Schreindorfer Karoly
    Kiss Agnes
    Marada Gyula
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2017, 158 (44) : 1747 - 1753
  • [38] Analysis of the Morphology of Maxillary Sinus Septa on Reconstructed Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images
    Qian, Liang
    Tian, Xiao-mei
    Zeng, Li
    Gong, Yao
    Wei, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (04) : 729 - 737
  • [39] Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars: a cone-beam computed tomography study
    de Lima, Carolina Oliveira
    de Souza, Laura Campos
    Devito, Karina Lopes
    do Prado, Maira
    Campos, Celso Neiva
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2019, 45 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [40] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Prevalence of Procedural Errors in Maxillary Posterior Teeth
    Nouroloyouni, Ahmad
    Nazi, Yousef
    Mikaieli Xiavi, Hesam
    Noorolouny, Sara
    Kuzekanani, Maryam
    Plotino, Gianluca
    Walsh, James Laurence
    Sheikhfaal, Behzad
    Alyali, Rashin
    Tavakkol, Elham
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 2023