Comparison of microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Effect of substrate sources and temperatures

被引:57
|
作者
Jiang, Junfeng [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wu, Peiwen [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sun, Yongming [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Yufang [2 ,5 ]
Song, Bing [6 ]
Huang, Yi [2 ,5 ]
Xing, Tao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Lianhua [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Radionuclides Pollut Contr, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Key Lab,Minist Educ Water Qual Secur & Protect Pe, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, CAS Key Lab Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Key Lab New & Renewable Energy Res & De, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Univ, Linkoping Univ Guangzhou Univ Res Ctr Urban Susta, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[6] Scion, Clean Technol, 49 Sala St,Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand
关键词
Kitchen waste; Anaerobic digestion; Microbial community; Sources; Temperature; FOOD WASTE; CO-DIGESTION; PROCESS STABILITY; ENERGY RECOVERY; PERFORMANCE; BIOGAS; INOCULUM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124016
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study, batch experiments were conducted to compare the effect of temperature and substrate source on microbial communities in the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste. The results showed that the microbial communities of anaerobic digestion were not sensitive to varied sources of waste, but shifted with the change in operating temperatures. In the reactors operated at mesophilic conditions, Levilinea, Syntrophomonas, Methanothrbc, and Methanosphaerula, etc. were the dominant microbes during the process. While in thermophilic reactors, Levilinea, Ornatilinea, Methanosphaerula and Methanomassiliicoccus, etc. prevailed. Meanwhile, an enrichment in Coprothermobacter, Defluviitoga, Defluviitalea, Tepidimicrobium, Lutispora and Fonticella were observed as the temperature changed from mesophilic to thermophilic, suggesting these genera could be selectively enriched at thermophilic conditions. The results provided fundamental understanding of the microbiology that could support the scale up of food waste anaerobic digestion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of substrate load on microbial community of anaerobic digestion in straw and sludge
    Li H.
    Yang Z.
    Chen Z.
    Liu P.
    Chen, Zhiqiang (czqhit@163.com), 1600, Harbin Institute of Technology (52): : 18 - 25
  • [42] Influence of zinc oxide nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge and microbial communities
    Wang, Shutao
    Chen, Lingbo
    Yang, Hao
    Liu, Zhisheng
    RSC ADVANCES, 2021, 11 (10) : 5580 - 5589
  • [43] Effect of different microbial seeds on batch anaerobic digestion of fish waste
    Jannat, Md Abu Hanifa
    Park, Sang Hyeok
    Chairattanawat, Chayanee
    Yulisa, Arma
    Hwang, Seokhwan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 349
  • [44] AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC MICROBIAL DIGESTION IN WASTE RECLAMATION
    PIRT, SJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1978, 28 (04): : 232 - 236
  • [45] Analysis on carbon dioxide emission reduction during the anaerobic synergetic digestion technology of sludge and kitchen waste: Taking kitchen waste synergetic digestion project in Zhenjiang as an example
    Guo, Qia
    Dai, Xiaohu
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 69 : 360 - 364
  • [46] Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion using kitchen waste and poultry manure as substrate—part 1: substrate ratio and effect of temperature
    Md Anisur Rahman
    Razu Shahazi
    Syada Noureen Basher Nova
    M. Rakib Uddin
    Md Shahadat Hossain
    Abu Yousuf
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 6635 - 6645
  • [47] Multivariate insights into enhanced biogas production in thermophilic dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with kitchen waste or garden waste: Process properties, microbial communities and metagenomic analyses
    Zhang, Siying
    Xiao, Mengyao
    Liang, Chengyu
    Chui, Chunmeng
    Wang, Na
    Shi, Jiping
    Liu, Li
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 361
  • [48] Co-digestion of kitchen waste and fruit–vegetable waste by two-phase anaerobic digestion
    Yu-Qiang Yang
    Dong-Sheng Shen
    Na Li
    Dong Xu
    Yu-Yang Long
    Xuan-Yu Lu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 2162 - 2171
  • [49] Deeper insights into the effects of substrate to inoculum ratio selection on the relationship of kinetic parameters, microbial communities, and key metabolic pathways during the anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Li, Yanzeng
    Chen, Zhou
    Peng, Yanyan
    Huang, Weizhao
    Liu, Junxiao
    Mironov, Vladimir
    Zhang, Shenghua
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 217
  • [50] Deeper Insights into the Effect of Humic Acid on Kitchen Waste Anaerobic Digestion: Enzyme Activities, Microbial Community Dynamics, and Key Metabolic Pathways
    Lyu, Lin
    Li, Yanzeng
    Zhang, Shenghua
    Chen, Zhou
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2023, 9 (10):