Evaluation of Bone Remodeling After Simultaneous Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Mandibular Angle Ostectomy in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism

被引:4
|
作者
Choi, Song Jay [1 ]
Sim, You-Song [1 ]
Han, Jeong Joon [2 ,3 ]
Kook, Min-Suk [2 ]
Park, Hong-Ju [2 ]
Oh, Hee-Kyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dent Sci Res Inst, 77 Yongbong Ro, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Hard Tissue Biointerface Res Ctr, Gwangju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SETBACK; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; DISPLACEMENT; RESECTION; PLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.044
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study assessed the postoperative bone remodeling after simultaneous sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and mandibular angle ostectomy using a 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography (CT) data. Materials and Methods: We designed and implemented a retrospective study that included patients who had undergone SSRO with (study group) or without (control group) mandibular angle ostectomy. Using CT data taken immediately after (T1) and 6 months (T2) after surgery, the vertical and horizontal morphologic changes of the mandibular angle were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. In the study group, the volumetric changes of the mandibular angle were assessed, and the bone regeneration rate was calculated. Results: A total of 58 mandibular angles were evaluated (32 in the study group and 26 in the control group). The study group exhibited significantly greater vertical bone regrowth at the middle and posterior regions of the mandibular angle ostectomy line compared with that in the control group (middle, P<.001; posterior, P<.001). Both groups showed significant horizontal bone regrowth at 6 months postoperatively (P<.01). In the study group, the postoperative vertical bone regrowth was significantly associated with the extent of exposed bone below the angle ostectomy line at T1 for all regions (P<.001). The percentage of postoperative regenerated bone volume relative to the volume of bone removed intraoperatively was 41.8%. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that significant bone regrowth could occur after mandibular angle ostectomy with simultaneous SSRO. Therefore, it is necessary to consider bone remodeling patterns in the treatment planning stage for better and more predictable surgical outcomes. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2071.e1 / 2071.e11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mandibular Stability After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Hybrid Technique in Asymmetric Patients
    Lee, Dong-Hun
    Cho, Sang-Ah
    Jeon, Ju-Hong
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (03) : 920 - 925
  • [42] Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
    Wong, Natalie Sui Miu
    Leung, Yiu Yan
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (04) : 1435 - 1448
  • [43] Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
    Natalie Sui Miu Wong
    Yiu Yan Leung
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 1435 - 1448
  • [44] Mandibular bone healing after advancement or setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Ueki, Koichiro
    Moroi, Akinori
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Hotta, Asami
    Hiraide, Ryota
    Takayama, Akihiro
    Tsunoda, Tatsuya
    Saito, Yuki
    Sato, Momoko
    Baba, Nana
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (09) : 1500 - 1503
  • [45] Physiological positioning strategy alters condylar position after mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular prognathism
    Ohba, Seigo
    Ozaki, Hiroya
    Miura, Kei-ichirou
    Koga, Takamitsu
    Kawasaki, Takako
    Yoshida, Noriaki
    Asahina, Izumi
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2018, 36 (03): : 181 - 188
  • [46] KINETICS OF FRACTURE-HEALING OF MANDIBULAR BONE FOLLOWING SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY OF THE PORCINE MANDIBULAR RAMUS
    ROBERTSON, DM
    SMITH, DC
    DAS, SK
    MUNRO, I
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1979, 12 (08) : 629 - 629
  • [47] Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial
    Leung, Y. Y.
    Wang, R.
    Wong, N. S. M.
    Li, D. T. S.
    Au, S. W.
    Choi, W. S.
    Su, Y. -x.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 933 - 939
  • [48] Influence of Osteotomy Design on Bilateral Mandibular Ramus Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Wolford, Larry M.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (10) : 1994 - 2004
  • [49] ATROPHY OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLES AFTER SAGITTAL RAMUS SPLIT OSTEOTOMY - REPORT OF CASE
    PHILLIPS, RM
    BELL, WH
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1978, 36 (01): : 45 - 49
  • [50] Pseudoaneurysm of the facial artery occurred after mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Jo H.-W.
    Kim Y.-S.
    Kang D.-H.
    Lee S.-H.
    Kwon T.-G.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2013, 17 (2) : 151 - 154