Better rank assignment in multiple-choice entrance exams

被引:0
|
作者
Chatterjee, Anindya [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2013年 / 105卷 / 02期
关键词
Multiple-choice exams; probability model; ranking; ties; TESTS; RELIABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Indian educational system administers many multiple-choice exams wherein a small percentage of candidates must receive unique ranks. But discrete marking causes ties, usually resolved by essentially arbitrary criteria. I suggest a better alternative via a probability model for the exam, participants' talent levels, and question difficulties. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that ranking accuracy improves if marks on each question are scaled by the population standard deviation for that question. Maximum marks obtained in the test should approach 100% without any ties. Finally, consideration of a guess-oriented test strategy suggests a target value for the lowest successful score.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating multiple-choice exams in large introductory physics courses
    Scott, Michael
    Stelzer, Tim
    Gladding, Gary
    PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (02):
  • [22] Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and "equivalent" constructed-response exam questions
    Chan, N
    Kennedy, PE
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2002, 68 (04) : 957 - 971
  • [23] CRIME IN THE CLASSROOM - DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF CHEATING ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE EXAMS
    HARPP, DN
    HOGAN, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1993, 70 (04) : 306 - 311
  • [24] FormScanner: Open-Source Solution for Grading Multiple-Choice Exams
    Young, Chadwick
    Lo, Glenn
    Young, Kaisa
    Borsetta, Alberto
    PHYSICS TEACHER, 2016, 54 (01): : 34 - 35
  • [25] Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
    Melzer, Andreas
    Gergs, Ulrich
    Lukas, Josef
    Neumann, Joachim
    EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [26] Benefiting from Multiple-Choice Exams: The positive impact of answer switching
    Di Milia, Lee
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (05) : 607 - 615
  • [27] On the relationship between regulatory focus and response bias in multiple-choice exams
    Stiglbauer, Barbara
    Zuber, Julia
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 39 (02) : 203 - 222
  • [28] Adding partial credit to multiple-choice ACS Exams: Process and results
    Raker, Jeffrey R.
    Grunert, Megan
    Murphy, Kristen
    Holme, Thomas A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [29] Differential daily writing contingencies and performance on major multiple-choice exams
    Hautau B.
    Turner H.C.
    Carroll E.
    Jaspers K.
    Parker M.
    Krohn K.
    Williams R.L.
    Journal of Behavioral Education, 2006, 15 (4) : 256 - 273
  • [30] ITEM SEQUENCE AND STUDENT PERFORMANCE ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE EXAMS - FURTHER EVIDENCE
    CARLSON, JL
    OSTROSKY, AL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1992, 23 (03): : 232 - 235