Evaluation of Three Sampling Methods for the Microbiological Analysis of Broiler Carcasses after Immersion Chilling

被引:6
|
作者
Giombelli, Audecir [1 ]
Cavani, Ricardo [2 ]
Abreu Gloria, Maria Beatriz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Fac Farm, Lab Bioquim Alimentos LbqA, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP Jaboticabal, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
关键词
CHICKEN CARCASSES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; SALMONELLA; CONTAMINATION; CAMPYLOBACTER; RINSE; WATER;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-004
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Countries have different official programs and implement different sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella on poultry carcasses. In Brazil, a 25-g sample of skin and muscle excision (SME) from the wings, neck, and pericloacal parts is used; in the European Union (EU), a 25-g sample of neck skin (NSE) is used; and, in the United States, the whole carcass is rinsed with 400 ml of diluent (WCR). In the present study, these methods were evaluated to compare Salmonella occurrence and counts of hygiene indicator microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, and total viable count of aerobic mesophilic bacteria) using different carcasses from the same flock and also using different analytical units taken from the same carcass. Eighty flocks, with four broiler carcasses from each, were included in this study; three broilers were sampled according to protocols from Brazil, the EU, and the United States, and the last one by all three methods. SME, NSE, and WCR provided equivalent results (P > 0.05) for Salmonella detection on broiler carcasses when using different carcasses from the same flock and when using the same carcass. The predominant serovar was Salmonella Enteritidis. For the enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms, WRC provided higher counts than SME or NSE (P < 0.05), when using both the same or different carcasses. Therefore, it is possible to directly compare Salmonella results in poultry carcasses when using the methods recommended by the legislative bodies of Brazil, the United States, and the EU. However, WCR provides the best results for hygiene indicator microorganisms.
引用
收藏
页码:1330 / 1335
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of effect of chilling steps during slaughtering on the Campylobacter sp. counts on broiler carcasses
    Stella, Simone
    Tirloni, Erica
    Bernardi, Cristian
    Grilli, Guido
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (03)
  • [42] Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli on broiler carcasses after chilling in southern Brazil
    Perdoncini, Gustavo
    Sierra-Arguello, Yuli M.
    Lima, Leonardo M.
    Trindade, Michele M.
    Pereira Gomes, Marcos Jose
    dos Santos, Luciana R.
    Schmidt, Veronica
    do Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2015, 35 (04): : 349 - 352
  • [43] Salmonella SPP. ON BROILER CARCASSES BEFORE AND AFTER CHILLING AT SLAUGHTERHOUSE UNDER SANITARY INSPECTION
    Simas, Vanessa Silva
    dos Santos, Felipe Faccini
    de Almeida Pereira, Virginia Leo
    Cosendey de Aquino, Maria Helena
    do Nascimento, Elmiro Rosendo
    da Costa Abreu, Dayse Lima
    Gouvea, Raquel
    Rodrigues, Dalia dos Prazeres
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA, 2011, 33 (04): : 220 - 224
  • [44] EVALUATION OF REPRESENTATIVE MICROBIOLOGICAL SAMPLING SITES OF GOAT AND SHEEP DRESSED CARCASSES.
    Rawal, T.N.
    Bali, G.S.
    Sharma, R.N.
    Defence Science Journal, 1980, 30 (03) : 131 - 136
  • [45] COMPARISON OF SAMPLING METHODS FOR ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND TOTAL AEROBIC COUNTS ON BROILER CARCASSES
    LILLARD, HS
    THOMSON, JE
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1983, 46 (09) : 781 - 782
  • [46] Microbial growth on broiler carcasses stored at different temperatures after air- or water-chilling
    Tuncer, B.
    Sireli, U. T.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2008, 87 (04) : 793 - 799
  • [47] An assessment of steam pasteurization and hot water immersion treatments for the microbiological decontamination of broiler carcasses (vol 20, pg 111, 2003)
    Whyte, P
    Mc Gill, K
    Collins, JD
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (02) : 247 - 247
  • [48] Comparison of sampling methods for microbiological testing of beef animal rectal/colonal feces, hides, and carcasses
    Ransom, JR
    Belk, KE
    Bacon, RT
    Sofos, JN
    Scanga, JA
    Smith, GC
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2002, 65 (04) : 621 - 626
  • [49] Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks
    Skov, MN
    Carstensen, B
    Tornoe, N
    Madsen, M
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (04) : 695 - 700
  • [50] Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses
    Pearce, RA
    Bolton, DJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 98 (04) : 896 - 900