Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: A randomized non-inferiority trial

被引:75
|
作者
Choi, Jeong Yeon [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Hye Sun [3 ]
Kim, Ji Young [1 ,2 ]
Han, Dong Woo [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Ju Yeon [3 ]
Kim, Min Jae [1 ]
Song, Young [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Anesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Res Affairs, Biostat Collaborat Unit, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 211 Eonjuro, Seoul 06273, South Korea
关键词
Remimazolam; Propofol; Anesthesia; Quality of recovery; Female; Thyroid surgery; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; REMIFENTANIL; SURGERY; MIDAZOLAM; SEDATION; SCORE; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110955
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: The quality of recovery (QoR) of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was compared as measured by QoR-15 scores.Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.Setting: An operating room, a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and a hospital ward.Patients: Female patients (n = 140; 20-65 years) scheduled for open thyroidectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to the remimazolam or propofol group.Interventions: The remimazolam group received continuous remimazolam infusions and effect-site target -controlled remifentanil infusions. The propofol group received effect-site target-controlled infusions of propofol and remifentanil. Measurements: The primary outcome was QoR-15 on postoperative day 1 (POD1). The mean difference between the groups was compared against a non-inferiority margin of-8. Secondary outcomes were QoR-15 on POD2, hemodynamic data, time to lose and recover consciousness, sedation score upon PACU admission, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting profiles at the PACU and ward. Group-time interaction effects in hemody-namic data and QoR-15 were analyzed using a linear mixed model.Main results: The total QoR-15 score on POD1 in the remimazolam group was non-inferior to that in the propofol group (mean [SD] 111.2 [18.8] vs. 109.1 [18.9]; mean difference [95% CI] 2.1 [-4.2, 8.5]; p = 0.002 for non -inferiority). The QoR-15 score on POD2 was comparable between the groups, and no group-time interaction was observed. At the end of anesthesia, after extubation, and upon arrival at the PACU, mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the remimazolam group. Remimazolam group was more sedated at the time of admission to PACU. Pain intensity and the requirement for analgesics were lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group.Conclusions: Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia provided a similar QoR to propofol. Remimazolam and propofol can be used interchangeably for general anesthesia in female patients undergoing thyroid surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of remimazolam vs propofol on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures: A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Zhang, Junbao
    Zhang, Jiuxiang
    Wang, Yunying
    Bai, Xiaoguang
    Guo, Qingdong
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Hui
    Zhu, Fei
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Jiang, Xiaofan
    Dong, Hailong
    Zhang, Haopeng
    Lu, Zhihong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 93
  • [22] Comparison of Effect Sevoflurane-Based Anesthesia and Propofol-Based Anesthesia on the Early Postoperative Renal Function of Living Kidney Transplant Donors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cai, Jianyue
    Kang, Fang
    Han, Mingming
    Huang, Xiang
    Yan, Wenlong
    Wan, Fuzhen
    Li, Juan
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2025, 19 : 491 - 503
  • [23] Comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia versus volatile agent-based anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Park, Ji-In
    Na, Hyo-Seok
    Lee, Keum-O
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Shin, Hyun-Jung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 78 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [24] Comparison of Remimazolam-Based Monitored Anesthesia Care and Inhalation-Based General Anesthesia in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Randomized-Controlled Trial
    Cho, Jin Sun
    Ham, Won Sik
    Lee, Bahn
    Kim, Hyun Il
    Park, Jin Ha
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [25] The effect of remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia on emergence delirium in children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Ma, Hong-Yu
    Cai, Yu-Hang
    Zhong, John Wei
    Chen, Jia
    Wang, Zhen
    Lin, Chao-Yi
    Wang, Qiao-Qiao
    Liu, Hua-Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [26] Safety and Feasibility of Etomidate-Based Sedation Compared With Propofol-Based Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial
    Park, Chan Hyuk
    Park, Se Woo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB641 - AB641
  • [27] Effect of propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia on postoperative cognitive function and sleep quality in elderly patients
    Ding, Fang
    Wang, Xiuli
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Jinru
    Liu, Feifei
    Wang, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (07)
  • [28] Excess nasopharyngeal secretions in ocular surgery under propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia
    Lai, Hou-Chuan
    Wu, Zhi-Fu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 34 : 257 - 257
  • [29] Postoperative analgesia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy under sevoflurane versus propofol-based anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
    Atef, Hossam M.
    Ismail, Salah A.
    Al-Touny, Ahmad
    Abo-Rehab, Sherif Eid Ahmed
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 11 (1)
  • [30] Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in glioblastoma surgery
    Huang, Yi-Hsuan
    Wu, Zhi-Fu
    Lee, Meei-Shyuan
    Lou, Yu-Sheng
    Wu, Ke-Li
    Cheng, Kuang-, I
    Lai, Hou-Chuan
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):