Stochastic optimization methods for ship resistance and operational efficiency via CFD

被引:40
|
作者
Diez, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Campana, Emilio F. [1 ]
Stern, Frederick [2 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Marine Technol Res Inst, CNR INSEAN, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Iowa, IIHR Hydrosci & Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Hydrodynamic optimization; Reliability-based robust design optimization; Uncertainty quantification; Resistance; Operability (operational efficiency); URANS (unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes); SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; INTERFERENCE; SIMULATIONS; FORMULATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-017-1775-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hull-form stochastic optimization methods are presented and evaluated for resistance reduction and operational efficiency (operability), addressing stochastic sea state and operations. The cost/benefit analysis of the optimization procedure is presented by comparison of four hierarchical problems, from stochastic most general to deterministic least general. The parent hull is a high-speed catamaran, with geometrical constraints for maximum variation of length, beam, draft, and displacement. Problem 1 is used as a benchmark for the evaluation of the other problem formulations and is defined as a multi-objective stochastic optimization for resistance and operability, considering stochastic sea state and speed, but limited to head waves. Problem 2 is a multi-objective stochastic optimization for resistance and motions at fixed sea state and speed. Problem 3 is a multi-objective deterministic optimization for resistance and motions using a single regular wave at fixed speed. Problem 4 is a single-objective deterministic optimization for calm-water resistance at fixed speed. The design optimization is based on hull-form modifications by the Karhunen-LoSve expansion of a free-form deformation, URANS-based CFD simulations, regular wave approximations for irregular waves, metamodels and multi-objective particle swarm. The design optimization achieves an 8.7, 23, 53, and 10% average improvements for problems 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Comparing to problem 1, problem 2, 3, 4 optimized designs have average performances 1, 2.1 and 1.7% worse, respectively. The most efficient problem, from the computational cost/benefit viewpoint, is problem 3. Nevertheless, problem 1 is needed to evaluate and compare the stochastic performance of the designs and finally assess the optimization cost/benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 758
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Online Statistical Inference for Stochastic Optimization via Kiefer-Wolfowitz Methods
    Chen, Xi
    Lai, Zehua
    Li, He
    Zhang, Yichen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024,
  • [42] Gradient based design optimization under uncertainty via stochastic expansion methods
    Keshavarzzadeh, Vahid
    Meidani, Hadi
    Tortorelli, Daniel A.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 306 : 47 - 76
  • [43] Discrete optimization via gradient-based adaptive stochastic search methods
    Chen, Xi
    Zhou, Enlu
    Hu, Jiaqiao
    IISE TRANSACTIONS, 2018, 50 (09) : 789 - 805
  • [44] CFD ANALYSIS OF BLAST FURNACE OPERATING CONDITION IMPACTS ON OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
    Okosun, Tyamo
    Silaen, Armin K.
    Tang, Guangwu
    Wu, Bin
    Zhou, Chenn Q.
    CFD MODELING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS PROCESSING 2016, 2016, : 75 - 82
  • [45] An application of fuzzy-AHP to ship operational energy efficiency measures
    Besikci, E. Bal
    Kececi, T.
    Arslan, O.
    Turan, O.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2016, 121 : 392 - 402
  • [46] Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator Resilient, Ship Emissions under Control
    Montes, Julio Barreiro
    Diaz, Feliciano Fraguela
    Diaz-Casas, Vicente
    Zaragoza, Sonia
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [47] Modeling and simulation analysis to establish ship energy efficiency operational indicator
    Liu Y.
    Sun P.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhang P.
    Liu, Yifan (liuyifan@dlmu.edu.cn), 2016, Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Engineering (37): : 1015 - 1021
  • [48] Operational cycles for maritime transportation: A benchmarking tool for ship energy efficiency
    Godet, Amandine
    Nurup, Jacob Normann
    Saber, Jonas Thoustrup
    Panagakos, George
    Barfod, Michael Bruhn
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 121
  • [49] Operational Safety and Efficiency - "Sail by Wire" - System In Unmanned Ship Perspective
    Kruszewski, Jan
    2015 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS AND MODELS IN AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS (MMAR), 2015, : 950 - 954
  • [50] Analysis of the operational ship energy efficiency considering navigation environmental impacts
    Yuan, Yupeng
    Li, Zhixiong
    Malekian, Reza
    Yan, Xinping
    JOURNAL OF MARINE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 16 (03): : 150 - 159