Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: Evidence from China

被引:50
|
作者
Cheng, Minying [1 ]
Lin, Bingxuan [2 ,4 ]
Lu, Rui [3 ]
Wei, Minghai [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Int Sch Business & Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Coll Business Adm, Kingston, RI USA
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Coll, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ownership structure; Large shareholder monitoring; Insider trading; MULTIPLE LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM; STOCK OPTION AWARDS; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FAMILY OWNERSHIP; BALANCE-SHEET; EARNINGS; COST; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Non-controlling large shareholders play an important role in corporate governance in emerging markets where controlling shareholder expropriation is a major concern. We argue that noncontrolling large shareholders are faced with two non-conflicting incentives: to take advantage of their information advantage and obtain positive abnormal returns when they trade company shares, and to serve as effective monitors and minimize controlling shareholders' appropriation of company wealth. Using a sample of large shareholders' selling events upon the expiration of the lockup period following the split-share structure reform in China, we find that non-controlling large shareholders successfully time the market, as shown by their positive abnormal returns when selling their shares. Their returns are higher if they have a greater information advantage. Furthermore, the positive returns of the controlling large shareholder are negatively related to non-controlling large shareholders ownership, suggesting that non-controlling large shareholders play a monitoring role and prevent controlling shareholders from looting the company. We also show that large shareholders affiliated with the controlling shareholders are not subject to as high a level of monitoring as those controlling shareholders are. Furthermore, both firm opaqueness and the severity of agency cost affect the quality of non-controlling large shareholders monitoring. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple large shareholders and corporate fraud: evidence from China
    Zhao, Xibo
    Yang, Dan
    Li, Zhengguang
    Song, Lynda
    FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2021, 15 (01)
  • [22] Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Fuxiu
    Cai, Wenjing
    Wang, Xue
    Zhu, Bing
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 50 : 66 - 83
  • [23] Multiple large shareholders and cost stickiness: evidence from China
    Zhang, Bo
    Geng, Heyu
    Zhou, Ruixue
    Yang, Limei
    ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 55 (02) : 188 - 216
  • [24] Multiple large shareholders and cash holdings: Evidence from China
    Chen, Yinghui
    Chen, Miao
    Huang, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 103
  • [25] Stock liquidity and controlling shareholders' encroachment of private interests: Evidence from China
    He, Xiqiong
    Gu, Xiang
    Liu, Hao
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 56
  • [26] ECONOMIC OUTCOMES OF CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS' FOREIGN RESIDENCY RIGHTS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Wang, Hong
    Bi, Lihua
    He, Jianmei
    Hong, Suli
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 21 (03): : 34 - 51
  • [27] Do controlling shareholders expropriate employees? Evidence from workplace fatalities in China
    Liu, Hang
    Luo, Jin-hui
    Wang, Xin
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 69
  • [28] Does Non-controlling Large Shareholder Monitoring Improve CEO Incentives?
    Hui, Zhiyang
    Fang, Hongyan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (05) : 1262 - 1275
  • [29] Multiple Large Shareholders, Excess Leverage and Tunneling: Evidence from an Emerging Market
    Boateng, Agyenim
    Huang, Wei
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2017, 25 (01) : 58 - 74
  • [30] Do markets penalize agency conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders? Evidence from Chile
    Lefort, Fernando
    Walker, Eduardo
    DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2007, 45 (03): : 283 - 314