A role for the ventral visual stream in reporting movements

被引:3
|
作者
Farrer, C
Passingham, RE
Frith, CD
机构
[1] Inst Cognit Sci, F-69675 Bron, France
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[3] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Dept Cognit Neurol, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.2001.0996
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In this experiment we contrast the neural activity associated with reporting a stimulus attribute with the activity that occurs when the same stimulus attribute is used to guide behavior. Reporting the characteristics of a stimulus differs from simply tracking that stimulus since reporting requires that a stimulus is explicitly recognized and associated with an arbitrary response. In one condition the subject used his right finger to follow a square that moved randomly on a screen. In a second condition he had to indicate changes in the direction of the square's movements by touching one of two report buttons with his right finger. Two other conditions were added to control for the differences in the form of movement between the two primary conditions. When the reporting condition was contrasted with the tracking condition (controlling for the differences in the form of movement), areas in the ventral visual system (the left ventral prefrontal cortex and the left inferior temporal cortex) were activated. This study shows that contrasting a manual task which involves a report with a manual task which does not activates the ventral visual system. However, the observation of additional activity in other areas suggests that, while activity in the ventral stream is necessary for reporting, it is not sufficient. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Representational content in visual ventral stream is modulated by level of specificity
    Andreas, M.
    Devereux, B.
    Clarke, A.
    Tyler, L.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 56 - 56
  • [32] Task-dependent functional organizations of the visual ventral stream
    Han-Gue Jo
    Junji Ito
    Barbara Schulte Holthausen
    Conrad Baumann
    Sonja Grün
    Ute Habel
    Thilo Kellermann
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [33] Visual Processing in Noonan Syndrome: Dorsal and Ventral Stream Sensitivity
    Alfieri, Paolo
    Cesarini, Laura
    De Rose, Paola
    Ricci, Daniela
    Selicorni, Angelo
    Menghini, Deny
    Guzzetta, Andrea
    Baranello, Giovanni
    Tinelli, Francesca
    Mallardi, Maria
    Zampino, Giuseppe
    Vicari, Stefano
    Atkinson, Janette
    Mercuri, Eugenio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2011, 155A (10) : 2459 - 2464
  • [34] Synchronization between the end stages of the dorsal and the ventral visual stream
    Verhoef, Bram-Ernst
    Vogels, Rufin
    Janssen, Peter
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (05) : 2030 - 2042
  • [35] Visual prototypes in the ventral stream are attuned to complexity and gaze behavior
    Rose, Olivia
    Johnson, James
    Wang, Binxu
    Ponce, Carlos R.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [36] Comparison of human and monkey visual perception after lesions of the ventral visual processing stream
    Huxlin, KR
    Merigan, WH
    Hayes, R
    Saunders, R
    Pham, HA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 4935 - 4935
  • [37] fMRI reveals how pain modulates visual object processing in the ventral visual stream
    Bingel, Ulrike
    Rose, Michael
    Glascher, Jan
    Buchel, Christian
    NEURON, 2007, 55 (01) : 157 - 167
  • [38] The Optimal Human Ventral Stream from Estimates of the Complexity of Visual Objects
    Mark A. Changizi
    Biological Cybernetics, 2006, 94 : 415 - 426
  • [39] Concordance between perceptual and categorical repetition effects in the ventral visual stream
    Fairhall, Scott L.
    Anzellotti, Stefano
    Pajtas, Petra E.
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 106 (01) : 398 - 408
  • [40] Evidence for rapid localist plasticity in the ventral visual stream: the example of words
    Riesenhuber, Maximilian
    Glezer, Laurie S.
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 32 (03) : 286 - 294