Gender Differences in Institutional Long-Term Care Transitions

被引:22
|
作者
Mudrazija, Stipica [1 ]
Thomeer, Mieke Beth [2 ]
Angel, Jacqueline L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Social Work, Edward R Roybal Inst Aging, Los Angeles, CA 90015 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Sociol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Lyndon B Johnson Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; INFORMANT QUESTIONNAIRE; COGNITIVE DECLINE; OLDER AMERICANS; ELDERLY IQCODE; DISCHARGE; RISK; COMMUNITY; OUTCOMES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study investigates the relationship between gender, the likelihood of discharge from institutional long-term care (LTC) facilities, and post-discharge living arrangements, highlighting sociodemographic, health, socioeconomic, and family characteristics. Methods: We use the Health and Retirement Study to examine individuals age 65 and older admitted to LTC facilities between 2000 and 2010 (n = 3,351). We examine discharge patterns using survival analyses that account for the competing risk of death and estimate the probabilities of post-discharge living arrangements using multinomial logistic regression models. Results: Women are more likely than men to be discharged from LTC facilities during the first year of stay. Women are more likely to live alone or with kin after discharge, whereas men are more likely to live with a spouse or transfer to another institution. Gender differences in the availability and use of family support may partly account for the gender disparity of LTC discharge and post-discharge living arrangements. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that women and men follow distinct pathways after LTC discharge. As local and federal efforts begin to place more emphasis on the transition from LTC facilities to prior communities (e.g., transitional care initiatives under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), policymakers should take these gender differences into account in the design of community transition programs. Copyright (C) 2015 by the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 449
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EXPLORING THE TRANSITIONS OF LONG-TERM CARE RECIPIENTS: UNPACKING HOSPITALIZATIONS
    Abbott, K.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 498 - 499
  • [42] Long-term mechanical ventilation and transitions in care: A narrative review
    Xiao, Lena
    Amin, Reshma
    Nonoyama, Mika Laura
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2023, 20
  • [43] Transitions to long-term and residential care among older Canadians
    Garner, Rochelle
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    Manuel, Douglas G.
    Sanmartin, Claudia
    HEALTH REPORTS, 2018, 29 (05) : 13 - 23
  • [44] Transitions of care for advanced cancer in post-acute and long-term care
    Burke, Olivia
    Levine, Stacie K.
    Mir, Nabiel
    Gleason, Lauren J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 (05) : 1680 - 1684
  • [45] TRANSITIONS IN CARE: INDIVIDUAL, CONTEXTUAL, AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES ON LONG-TERM CARE PLANNING
    不详
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 289 - 289
  • [46] The Association of Antipsychotic Use with Care Transitions among Long-Term Care Residents
    Holmes, S.
    Kuzucan, A.
    Brandt, N.
    Qato, D.
    Zarowitz, B.
    Wastila, L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 : S85 - S85
  • [47] Gender Wage Gap, Gender Norms, and Long-Term Care: A Theoretical Framework
    Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Seo, Bongsun
    Floro, Maria S.
    FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2022, 28 (03) : 84 - 113
  • [48] Evolution of institutional long-term care costs based on health factors
    Shemendyuk, Aleksandr
    Wagner, Joel
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2025, 120 : 107 - 130
  • [49] Long-term survival after falls among the elderly in institutional care
    Nurmi, IS
    Lüthje, PMJ
    Kataja, JM
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2004, 38 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [50] PLANNING NEW INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES FOR LONG-TERM CARE - NICHOLSON,E
    LITTAUER, D
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1956, 11 (02): : 206 - 206