Initial experience of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths

被引:15
|
作者
Hakmi, Samer [1 ]
Pecha, Simon [1 ]
Sill, Bjoern [1 ]
Reiter, Beate [1 ]
Willems, Stephan [2 ]
Aydin, Muhammet Ali [2 ]
Yildirim, Yalin [1 ]
Reichenspurner, Hermann [1 ]
Treede, Hendrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Laser lead extraction; Pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; UNITED-STATES; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivt428
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Laser lead extraction is a challenging procedure, especially in patients with old or multiple pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads. The mechanical force is a leading cause of complications during the extraction procedure. Use of new laser sheaths, which deliver a rate of 80 pulses per second, may probably reduce intraoperative adverse events by reduction of extraction force. METHODS: Between January 2012 and April 2013, 76 PM and ICD leads were treated in 38 patients using GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths. Indications for lead removals were pocket infection (42.1%), septicaemia or endocarditis (23.7%), lead dysfunction (31.6%) and upgrade from PM to ICD (2.6%). Data on procedural success rates, intra-and postoperative outcomes, as well as 30-day mortality were collected into a database and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 62.0 +/- 17.7 years (range 18-83), and 73.7% were male. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 96.0 +/- 58.3 months (range 24-288). Thirty-seven (48.7%) PM and 39 (51.3%) ICD leads had to be extracted. The mean procedural time was 68.3 +/- 27.3 min (range 35-115). Seventy-two of 76 leads (94.8%) were completely removed, partial removal was achieved in 2 (2.6%) leads and a failure of extraction occurred in 2 (2.6%) leads. The overall complication rate was 5.2%, including one major (superior vena cava perforation) (2.6%) and one minor (pocket haematoma) (2.6%) complication. No death occurred during the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheath allows safe and effective removal of chronically implanted PM and ICD leads, combining high procedural success with low complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 60
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between percutaneous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads and pacemaker leads
    Klug, D.
    Marquie, C.
    Brigadeau, F.
    Guedon, L.
    Kouakam, C.
    Lacroix, D.
    Kacet, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 397 - 397
  • [32] Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction
    Hauser, Robert G.
    Katsiyiannis, William T.
    Gornick, Charles C.
    Almquist, Adrian K.
    Kallinen, Linda M.
    EUROPACE, 2010, 12 (03): : 395 - 401
  • [33] Initial clinical experience with a new down-sized implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
    Klein, H
    Auricchio, A
    Huvelle, E
    Nisam, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 : 9 - 14
  • [34] Initial experience with a laser sheath to extract chronic transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads
    Krishnan, SC
    Epstein, LM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (10): : 1293 - +
  • [35] Impact of coils and fixation mechanism on implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction
    Segreti, L.
    Bongiorni, M. G.
    Di Cori, A.
    Zucchelli, G.
    Viani, S.
    Paperini, L.
    De Lucia, R.
    Coluccia, G.
    Romano, S. L.
    Soldati, E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 375 - 375
  • [36] Nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead extraction: Results and comparison with extraction of pacemaker leads
    Saad, EB
    Saliba, WI
    Schweikert, RA
    Al-Khadra, AS
    Abdul-Karim, A
    Niebauer, MJ
    Wilkoff, BL
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (10): : 1944 - 1950
  • [37] Prophylactic Lead Extraction at Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Change
    Mendenhall, G. Stuart
    Saba, Samir
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 7 (02): : 330 - 336
  • [38] Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
    Weinstock, Jonathan
    Bader, Yousef H.
    Maron, Martin S.
    Rowin, Ethan J.
    Link, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (02):
  • [39] Percutaneous Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Extraction in 100 Patients With Intracardiac Vegetations Defined by Transesophageal Echocardiogram
    Grammes, Jon A.
    Schulze, Christopher M.
    Al-Bataineh, Mohammad
    Yesenosky, George A.
    Saari, Christine S.
    Vrabel, Michelle J.
    Horrow, Jay
    Chowdhury, Mashiul
    Fontaine, John M.
    Kutalek, Steven P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (09) : 886 - 894
  • [40] INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH A NEW AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR
    COOPER, MJ
    DAMICI, C
    STEPHENS, ACN
    JOHNSON, DC
    UTHER, JB
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (03): : 382 - 382