Initial experience of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths

被引:15
|
作者
Hakmi, Samer [1 ]
Pecha, Simon [1 ]
Sill, Bjoern [1 ]
Reiter, Beate [1 ]
Willems, Stephan [2 ]
Aydin, Muhammet Ali [2 ]
Yildirim, Yalin [1 ]
Reichenspurner, Hermann [1 ]
Treede, Hendrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Laser lead extraction; Pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; UNITED-STATES; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivt428
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Laser lead extraction is a challenging procedure, especially in patients with old or multiple pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads. The mechanical force is a leading cause of complications during the extraction procedure. Use of new laser sheaths, which deliver a rate of 80 pulses per second, may probably reduce intraoperative adverse events by reduction of extraction force. METHODS: Between January 2012 and April 2013, 76 PM and ICD leads were treated in 38 patients using GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths. Indications for lead removals were pocket infection (42.1%), septicaemia or endocarditis (23.7%), lead dysfunction (31.6%) and upgrade from PM to ICD (2.6%). Data on procedural success rates, intra-and postoperative outcomes, as well as 30-day mortality were collected into a database and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 62.0 +/- 17.7 years (range 18-83), and 73.7% were male. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 96.0 +/- 58.3 months (range 24-288). Thirty-seven (48.7%) PM and 39 (51.3%) ICD leads had to be extracted. The mean procedural time was 68.3 +/- 27.3 min (range 35-115). Seventy-two of 76 leads (94.8%) were completely removed, partial removal was achieved in 2 (2.6%) leads and a failure of extraction occurred in 2 (2.6%) leads. The overall complication rate was 5.2%, including one major (superior vena cava perforation) (2.6%) and one minor (pocket haematoma) (2.6%) complication. No death occurred during the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheath allows safe and effective removal of chronically implanted PM and ICD leads, combining high procedural success with low complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 60
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial experience with larger laser sheaths for the removal of transvenous pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads
    Epstein, LM
    Byrd, CL
    Wilkoff, BL
    Love, CJ
    Sellers, TD
    Hayes, DL
    Reiser, C
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (05) : 516 - 525
  • [2] Initial experience of excimer laser extraction of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads
    Ardashev, A. V.
    Dzhandzhgava, A. O.
    Konev, A. V.
    Shavarov, A. A.
    Kuznetsov, Y. V.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 18 : S96 - S96
  • [3] Optimal environment for pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction with a laser sheath
    Bracke, FA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (11): : 1594 - 1594
  • [4] Implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction: is it safe to do it again?
    Cubberley, A.
    Sharedalal, P.
    Shah, N.
    Essilfie, G.
    Burkman, G.
    Saltzman, H. E.
    Kutalek, S. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 1800 - 1800
  • [5] THE INITIAL CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR ANTITACHYCARDIA PACEMAKER
    SINGER, I
    AUSTIN, E
    NASH, W
    GILBO, J
    KUPERSMITH, J
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 14 (07): : 1119 - 1128
  • [6] Initial experience using Excimer laser for the extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads in Japanese patients
    Okamura, Hideo
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Sato, Shunsuke
    Ogawa, Koji
    Nakajima, Ikutaro
    Noda, Takashi
    Shimahara, Yusuke
    Hayashi, Teruyuki
    Onishi, Yoshihiko
    Kobayashi, Junjiro
    Kamakura, Shiro
    Ogawa, Hisao
    Shimizu, Wataru
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (3-4) : 195 - 200
  • [7] Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads
    Kantharia, BK
    Kutalek, SP
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 14 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [8] Initial Experience With Excimer Laser-Assisted Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction
    Mosquera, Victor X.
    Perez-Alvarez, Luisa
    Ricoy-Martinez, Enrique
    Mosquera-Perez, Ignacio
    Castro-Beiras, Alfonso
    Cuenca-Castillo, Jose J.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 64 (09): : 824 - 827
  • [9] Comparison of different modalities of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction.
    Padder, T
    Abdullah, B
    Hafeez, A
    Kantharial, B
    Padder, F
    Panjrath, G
    Samuels, F
    Baessler, C
    Saaril, C
    Kutalek, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (6A): : 65H - 65H
  • [10] Automated Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator/Pacemaker Lead Fracture
    Rubero, Lose
    Ramlatchan, Sidhartha R.
    Solomon, Matthew
    George, Andrew
    Ganti, Latha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)