Effects of upright positions during the second stage of labour for women without epidural analgesia: A meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Zang, Yu [1 ]
Lu, Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Huixin [2 ]
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Ren, Lihua [1 ]
Li, Chunying [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Nursing, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Lib, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
childbirth; maternal health; meta-analysis; nursing; systematic review; upright position; PERINEAL OUTCOMES; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SUPINE POSITION; BIRTHING POSITION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RISK-FACTORS; DELIVERY; TEARS; CHAIR;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14587
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims To assess the effects of upright positions on maternal outcomes for women without epidural analgesia in comparison with recumbent positions during the second stage of labour. Background Upright positions have many physiological advantages. The underlying benefits and risks of upright positions during the second stage of labour have been reported in many studies but the results are divergent. Design A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data sources The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ProQuest databases were systematically searched from inception to 17 June 2019. Review methods We conducted the quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and performed meta-analyses using the Review Manager 5.3 software. The primary outcomes were instrumental vaginal delivery and the duration of the second stage of labour. Results Overall, 12 studies including 4,314 women were included. Upright positions significantly decreased the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93), shortened the active pushing phase (mean difference [MD] = -8.16 min, 95% CI -16.29 to -0.02), decreased the rate of severe perineal trauma (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87) and episiotomy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92), but significantly increased the rate of second-degree perineal trauma (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.90). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage of labour or postpartum haemorrhage. Conclusions Upright positions are beneficial for improving maternal outcomes. Several results should be considered with caution. Researchers need to clarify the definition of upright positions and conduct large, robust studies in the future to provide stronger evidence. Impact This meta-analysis explores a crucial issue in intrapartum care and clarifies the benefits and possible risks of upright positions in the second stage of labour. Midwives and obstetricians are encouraged to apply upright positions depending on women's preferences and labour progress but should take measures to prevent perineal trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:3293 / 3306
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Chinese midwives' perceptions on upright positions during the second stage of labour: A qualitative study
    Zang, Yu
    Lu, Hong
    Zhang, Huixin
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Yang, Minghui
    Huang, Jing
    MIDWIFERY, 2021, 98
  • [12] A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of Labor
    Brancato, Robyn M.
    Church, Sara
    Stone, Patricia W.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2008, 37 (01): : 4 - 12
  • [13] Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour
    deJong, PR
    Johanson, RB
    Baxen, P
    Adrians, VD
    vanderWesthuisen, S
    Jones, PW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05): : 567 - 571
  • [14] Effectiveness of the peanut ball use for women with epidural analgesia in labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delgado, Alexandre
    Katz, Leila
    Melo, Renato S.
    Amorim, Melania
    Lemos, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 726 - 733
  • [15] Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour
    Eason, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (03): : 291 - 292
  • [16] HOSPITAL MIDWIVES' BARRIERS WHEN FACILITATING UPRIGHT POSITIONS DURING A NORMAL SECOND STAGE OF LABOUR
    Atsali, Eunice N.
    Russell, Kim
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY, 2018, 20 (01):
  • [17] Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour
    Heesen, M.
    Van de Velde, M.
    Kloehr, S.
    Lehberger, J.
    Rossaint, R.
    Straube, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [18] Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour - Reply
    de Jong, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (03): : 292 - 292
  • [19] Management of the second stage of labor in women with epidural analgesia
    Jacobson, Peri
    Turner, Leslie
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2008, 53 (01) : 82 - 85
  • [20] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia:: a meta-analysis
    van der Vyver, M
    Halpern, S
    Joseph, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (03) : 459 - 465