Antiphase domain boundaries in thin films of magnetite

被引:15
|
作者
Rudee, ML
Margulies, DT
Berkowitz, AE
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,CTR MAGNET RECORDING RES,SAN DIEGO,CA 92093
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,GRAD PROGRAM MAT SCI,SAN DIEGO,CA 92093
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT PHYS,SAN DIEGO,CA 92093
关键词
antiphase domain boundaries; Fe3O4; magnetite; ferromagnetic thin films; transmission electron microscopy; selected area electron diffraction;
D O I
10.1017/S1431927697970094
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Films of Fe3O4 were prepared by sputter deposition onto MgO substrates of both [100] and [110] orientations. The films used in this study were mainly 50 nm thick. X-ray diffraction, Mossbauer spectroscopy, and other techniques revealed that the films were stoichiometric single crystals. Electron microscopy showed that the films were essentially dislocation free. Despite this high degree of perfection, the magnetic properties of the films were inconsistent with bulk single crystal properties. For example, the magnetization of the films did not saturate in fields as large as 7 Tesla, while bulk single crystals saturate by 0.1 Tesla. The films were removed from the substrates in a reactive bath and examined in a transmission electron microcope. It is observed that the films contain a high density of antiphase domain boundaries (APBs), spaced several tens of nanometers apart. The APBs tend to lie in the {110} planes. Preliminary modeling indicates that the APBs could produce the anomalous high field behavior. The electron diffraction patterns repeatedly showed unusually prominent diffraction spots that are not allowed by the standard kinematical structure factor. These extra spots appeared in several zone axes in films of the two growth orientations that were studied. They also appeared, albeit with less intensity, in a specimen that was thinned from a bulk single crystal that did not exhibit APBs.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 129
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anisotropic feature of antiphase domain boundaries in tetragonal zirconia
    Shibata, N
    Katamura, J
    Ikuhara, Y
    Sakuma, T
    JAPAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 12, (JIMIC-3), PTS 1 AND 2: SOLID - SOLID PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS, 1999, : 1389 - 1392
  • [22] DIRECT OBSERVATION ON THE FORMATION OF ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN PIGEONITE
    SHIMOBAYASHI, N
    AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 1992, 77 (1-2) : 107 - 114
  • [23] The Structure of Domain and Antiphase Boundaries in κ-Phase of Gallium Oxide
    Vyvenko, O. F.
    Bondarenko, A. S.
    Ubyivovk, E. V.
    Shapenkov, S. V.
    Pechnikov, A. I.
    Nikolaev, V. I.
    Stepanov, S. I.
    CRYSTALLOGRAPHY REPORTS, 2024, 69 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [24] ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES WITHIN THETA' AND NU PRECIPITATES
    SANKARAN, R
    LAIRD, C
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1974, 15 (2-3): : 159 - 167
  • [25] ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN SILICON-IRON ALLOYS
    LIBOVICKY, S
    CZECHOSLOVAK JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1970, 20 (06) : 718 - +
  • [26] Pinning mechanism of vortices at antiphase boundaries in YBaCuO films
    Jooss, C
    Warthmann, R
    Kronmüller, H
    Zegenhagen, J
    Habermeier, HU
    PHYSICA C, 2000, 341 : 1419 - 1422
  • [27] Parameters of domain boundaries in thin PbTiO3 films
    Sidorkin, A. S.
    Nesterenko, L. P.
    Smirnov, A. L.
    Smirnov, G. L.
    Sidorkin, A. A.
    Ryabtsev, S. V.
    FERROELECTRICS, 2007, 360 : 147 - 152
  • [28] The importance of threading dislocations on the motion of domain boundaries in thin films
    El Gabaly, F
    Ling, WLW
    McCarty, KF
    de la Figuera, J
    SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5726) : 1303 - 1305
  • [29] Engineering antiphase domain boundaries boosted tunable ferromagnetic insulation
    Jia, Xiaomin
    Chen, Yanbin
    Nan, Ce-Wen
    Ma, Jing
    Chen, Chonglin
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2024, 125 (15)
  • [30] ELECTRON-DIFFRACTION CONTRAST EFFECTS AT ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES
    RENAULT, A
    PENISSON, JM
    BOURRET, A
    PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 1973, 28 (01): : 103 - 132