Scattered radiation doses absorbed by technicians at different distances from X-ray exposure: Experiments on prosthesis

被引:13
|
作者
Chiang, Hsien-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ya-Ling [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Tou-Rong [5 ]
Chen, Chun-Lon [1 ,2 ]
Chiang, Hsien-Jen [1 ,2 ]
Chao, Shin-Yu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Shing Hou Hosp, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Chung Shan Med Univ, Sch Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Portable X-ray machine; dose; exposure; ionization chamber dosimeter;
D O I
10.3233/BME-151463
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work aimed to investigate the spatial distribution of scattered radiation doses induced by exposure to the portable X-ray, the C-arm machine, and to simulate the radiologist without a shield of lead clothing, radiation doses absorbed by medical staff at 2 m from the central exposure point. Material and method: With the adoption of the Rando Phantom, several frequently X-rayed body parts were exposed to X-ray radiation, and the scattered radiation doses were measured by ionization chamber dosimeters at various angles from the patient. Assuming that the central point of the X-ray was located at the belly button, five detection points were distributed in the operation room at 1 m above the ground and 1-2 m from the central point horizontally. Results: The radiation dose measured at point B was the lowest, and the scattered radiation dose absorbed by the prosthesis from the X-ray's vertical projection was 0.07 +/- 0.03 mu Gy, which was less than the background radiation levels. The Fluke biomedical model 660-5DE (400 cc) and 660-3DE (4 cc) ion chambers were used to detect air dose at a distance of approximately two meters from the central point. The AP projection radiation doses at point B was the lowest (0.07 +/- 0.03 mu Gy) and the radiation doses at point D was the highest (0.26 +/- 0.08 mu Gy). Only taking the vertical projection into account, the radiation doses at point B was the lowest (0.52 mu Gy), and the radiation doses at point E was the highest (4 mu Gy). The PA projection radiation at point B was the lowest (0.36 mu Gy) and the radiation doses at point E was the highest(2.77 mu Gy), occupying 10-32% of the maximum doses. The maximum dose in five directions was nine times to the minimum dose. When the PX and the C-arm machine were used, the radiation doses at a distance of 2 m were attenuated to the background radiation level. The radiologist without a lead shield should stand at point B of patient's feet. Accordingly, teaching materials on radiation safety for radiological interns and clinical technicians were formulated.
引用
收藏
页码:S1641 / S1650
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] X-ray fluorescent analysis using scattered radiation
    Bakhtiyarov, A. V.
    INORGANIC MATERIALS, 2010, 46 (15) : 1618 - 1626
  • [22] X-RAY INSTRUMENTATION FOR ANALYSIS OF FLUORESCENT AND SCATTERED RADIATION
    DESLATTES, RD
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1992, 63 (01): : 1128 - 1133
  • [23] X-Ray Image Improvement by Filtering of Scattered Radiation
    Blinov A.B.
    Blinov N.N.
    Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 47 (05) : 235 - 238
  • [24] SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT OF X-RAY SCATTERED RADIATION IN RADIODIAGNOSIS
    Tang, Xian Qiang
    Zhao, Rui
    Zhu, Wei Feng
    Guo, Bin
    Qin, Feng
    Liu, Bo
    Wu, Jin Jie
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2023, 38 (02): : 125 - 134
  • [25] DESIGN TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO SCATTERED X-RAY-RADIATION
    SHEPARD, RL
    X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 1975, 4 (04) : 202 - 204
  • [26] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO EVALUATE SCATTERED X-RAY RADIATION DOSE RATE AT WORKPLACES WITH SURGICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY MACHINES
    Malcius, Mindaugas
    Maceika, Evaldas
    Urboniene, Ausra
    Marcinkevicius, Jonas
    Sakalauskas, Feliksas
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2015, : 90 - 91
  • [27] A synchrotron-based X-ray exposure station for radiation biology experiments
    Thompson, A. C.
    Blakely, E. A.
    Bjornstad, K. A.
    Chang, P. Y.
    Rosen, C. J.
    Schwarz, R. I.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 582 (01): : 226 - 228
  • [28] Effect of nanomaterials on the absorbed dose during an X-ray exposure
    Benlakhdar, F.
    Dib, A. S. A.
    Belbachir, A. H.
    RADIOPROTECTION, 2016, 51 (04) : 279 - 285
  • [29] RADIATION DOSE TO GONADS FROM DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXPOSURE
    LINCOLN, TA
    GUPTON, ED
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 166 (03): : 233 - 239
  • [30] Evaluation of the medical exposure doses regarding dental examinations with different X-ray instruments
    Liu, Yi-Chi
    Chuang, Keh-Shih
    Yu, Cheng-Ching
    Chao, Jiunn-Hsing
    Hsu, Fang-Yuh
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 116 : 386 - 392