Prioritizing Social Sustainability Indicators of Public Projects: A Chinese Context

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Hongyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yousong [1 ]
Yan, Hui [1 ]
Fang, Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Transportat, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Subtrop Bldg Sci, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Transportat Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Despite increased prosperity of public project provision in China, their social sustainability level is relatively low. To this end, this paper compiles a list of social sustainability indicators based on a comprehensive literature review. A series of interviews are then organized and experts invited to rate and prioritize these factors. The findings reveal that four participation-related indicators (i.e., F1 encouraging stakeholder participation, F2 well-established stakeholder participatory channels, F3 timely feedback to the participants, and F4 practical mechanisms coping with stakeholder conflicts), together with the safety issues, are the top concerns of the overall interviewees. Effective and efficient stakeholder participation helps to ensure the required public projects are properly planned, designed, built, operated, and demolished to serve the well-being of various parties in a complex society. Its development in the Chinese construction industry is however rudimentary and a comprehensive participatory framework is needed to improve project sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] System Estimation of Projects in the Context of Sustainability Conception
    Skorobogatova, N.
    RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2009, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 4, BOOK 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 270 - 275
  • [22] Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam
    Hugé J.
    Le Trinh H.
    Hai P.H.
    Kuilman J.
    Hens L.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2010, 12 (4) : 561 - 571
  • [23] Identification and assessment of sustainability performance indicators for construction projects
    Rajabi, Sareh
    El -Sayegh, Sameh
    Romdhane, Lotfi
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2022, 15
  • [24] Developing and identifying sustainability indicators in the Singapore context
    Khoo, H. H.
    Ee, A. W. L.
    Wang, Y.
    Adhitya, A.
    Low, Y. S.
    Lim, E. X. Y.
    Lee, C. K.
    Tan, R. B. H.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT X, 2015, 192 : 381 - 391
  • [25] New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System
    Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz
    Saparauskas, Jonas
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2013, 24 (05): : 408 - 414
  • [26] Model of social and environmental planning based the sustainability indicators data base in the context of the local development
    Tachizawa, Takeshy
    Pozo, Hamilton
    PASOS-REVISTA DE TURISMO Y PATRIMONIO CULTURAL, 2014, 12 (04) : 791 - 805
  • [27] On the concept of sustainability - assessing the sustainability of large public infrastructure investment projects
    Haavaldsen, Tore
    Laedre, Ola
    Volden, Gro Holst
    Lohne, Jardar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2014, 7 (01) : 2 - 12
  • [28] Social sustainability indicators and their relationship with the concept of social capital
    Puentes, Elquin
    Hidalgo-Guerrero, Adriana
    Betancourt, Carolina
    Ortiz-Bernal, Yenny
    REVISTA DE ARQUITECTURA, 2021, 23 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [29] A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects
    Suprayoga, Gede B.
    Bakker, Martha
    Witte, Patrick
    Spit, Tejo
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [30] Social sustainability in Public–Private Partnership projects: case study of the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney
    Wang, Kun
    Ke, Yongjian
    Liu, Tingting
    Sankaran, Shankar
    Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2022, 29 (06): : 2437 - 2460