Influence of hand-arm posture on biodynamic response of the human hand-arm exposed to zh-axis vibration

被引:54
|
作者
Aldien, Y
Marcotte, P
Rakheja, S
Boileau, PE
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, CONCAVE Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Inst Rech Robert Sauve Sante & Securite Travail, Montreal, PQ H3A 3C2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
hand-transmitted vibration; working posture; absorbed power; driving-point mechanical impedance; handle size; hand-arm vibration;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2005.07.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The influence of hand-arm posture on the biodynamic responses under z(h)-axis vibration is investigated in terms of driving point mechanical impedance and absorbed power under various combinations of hand grip and push forces, handle sizes and excitation levels. Laboratory measurements of the biodynamic responses were performed on seven healthy male subjects exposed to two levels of broadband random vibration in the 8-1000 Hz frequency range using three instrumented cylindrical handles of different diameter (30, 40 and 50 mm), and different grip (10, 30 and 50 N) and push (25, 50 and 75 N) forces. The experiments involved grasping the handle with two different postures, consisting in flexed forearm with elbow angle of 90 degrees and extended forearm with elbow angle of 180 degrees, with wrist being in the neutral position for both postures. The results revealed remarkable effects of the hand-arm posture on both the mechanical impedance and the absorbed power characteristics. The low-frequency apparent mass magnitude of the hand-arm with the extended forearm posture was observed to be approximately three times than that with the flexed forearm posture. Furthermore, the effects of handle size, and push and grip forces on the biodynamic responses of the human hand-arm exposed to vibration were observed to be more significant for the extended forearm posture. This posture revealed considerably higher coupling with the vibrating handle and a damper-like behavior of the hand-arm system in the very low-frequency range. This posture also resulted in considerably higher power absorption than the flexed forearm posture for the majority of the combinations of hand forces considered. Depending on the handle size, excitation level, and hand forces, the total power absorbed by the hand-arm with an extended hand-arm could be up to 96% higher than that with the flexed elbow. From the results, it is evident that the hand-arm posture strongly affects the biodynamic response, when exposed to z(h)-axis vibration. Relevance to industry Operators assume considerable variations in the hand-arm posture while operating hand-held power tools. Such variations coupled with variations in the hand forces imparted on the tool handle could cause considerably different biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system. The current International Standard describes the range of idealized biodynamic response in terms of the driving-point mechanical impedance under a fixed posture involving 90 degrees elbow angle (ISO-10068, 1998). The standard on the assessment of antivibration gloves also requires the same posture (ISO- 10819, 1996). This study presents the effect of hand-arm posture on the biodynamic responses in terms of both driving-point mechanical impedance and power absorption by the hand-arm system. The influences of hand forces and handle sizes on both measures are also presented. The results of the study clearly suggest high significance of the hand-arm posture in view of the biodynamic responses. The results of the study attained on the driving-point mechanical impedance are expected to provide the vital knowledge and data for enhancing the current standard and its applications. The results attained on the influence of posture on the absorbed power characteristics of the hand-arm system are further expected to enhance our knowledge on the assessment of vibration exposure. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 59
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Establishment of One-axis Vibration Test System for Measurement of Biodynamic Response of Human Hand-arm System
    Shibata, Nobuyuki
    Hosoya, Naoki
    Maeda, Setsuo
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2008, 46 (06) : 629 - 634
  • [22] BIODYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE HAND-ARM SYSTEM TO VIBRATION FROM AN IMPACT HAMMER AND A GRINDER
    KIHLBERG, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 1995, 16 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [23] A Multi-Axis Biodynamic Measuring Handle for a Human Hand-Arm System
    Knez, Luka
    Slavic, Janko
    Boltezar, Miha
    STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 59 (02): : 71 - 80
  • [24] Serum Metabolites in Hand-Arm Vibration Exposed Workers
    Vihlborg, Per
    Graff, Pal
    Hagenbjork, Annika
    Hadrevi, Jenny
    Bryngelsson, Ing-Liss
    Eriksson, Kare
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 62 (07) : 460 - 465
  • [25] HAND-ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME IN WORKERS EXPOSED TO PROLONGED VIBRATION
    Stoilova, Irena
    Kostadinova, Penka
    Birdanova, Vanya
    Kamburova, Mariela
    JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2024, 30 (03): : 5720 - 5723
  • [26] The effect of wrist posture on attenuation of vibration in the hand-arm system
    Fredericks, TK
    Fernandez, JE
    CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 1998, 1998, : 492 - 496
  • [27] The relationships between hand coupling force and vibration biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system
    Pan, Daniel
    Xu, Xueyan S.
    Welcome, Daniel E.
    McDowell, Thomas W.
    Warren, Christopher
    Wu, John
    Dong, Ren G.
    ERGONOMICS, 2018, 61 (06) : 818 - 830
  • [28] Hand-arm vibration syndrome in the workplace
    Maruti, Shobhit
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 65 (03): : 97 - 99
  • [29] Effects of elastic compression sleeves on the biodynamic response to external vibration of the hand-arm system
    Odenwald, Stephan
    Krumm, Dominik
    ENGINEERING OF SPORT 10, 2014, 72 : 114 - 119
  • [30] HAND-ARM VIBRATION .3. DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER DYNAMIC-MODEL OF HUMAN HAND-ARM SYSTEM
    WOOD, LA
    SUGGS, CW
    ABRAMS, CF
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1978, 57 (02) : 157 - 169