U.S. energy savings potential from dynamic daylighting control glazings

被引:46
|
作者
Shehabi, Arman [1 ]
DeForest, Nicholas [1 ]
McNeil, Andrew [1 ]
Masanet, Eric [2 ]
Greenblatt, Jeffery [1 ]
Lee, Eleanor S. [1 ]
Masson, Georgeta [3 ]
Helms, Brett A. [3 ]
Milliron, Delia J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Environm Energy Technol Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, McCormick Sch Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Mol Foundry, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Indoor environmental quality; Energy efficiency; Day lighting; Radiance; Glare; Dynamic prismatic optical elements (dPOE); Windows; Clerestories; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Daylighting controls have the potential to reduce the substantial amount of electricity consumed for lighting in commercial buildings. Material science research is now pursuing the development of a dynamic prismatic optical element (dPOE) window coating that can continuously readjust incoming light to maximize the performance and energy savings available from daylighting controls. This study estimates the technical potential for energy savings available from vertical daylighting strategies and explores additional savings that may be available if current dPOE research culminates in a successful market-ready product. Radiance daylight simulations are conducted with a multi-shape prismatic window coating. Simulated lighting energy savings are then applied to perimeter floorspace estimates generated from U.S. commercial building stock data. Results indicate that fully functional dPOE coatings, when paired with conventional vertical daylight strategies, have the potential to reduce energy use associated with U.S. commercial electric lighting demand by as much as 930TBtu. This reduction in electric lighting demand represents an approximately 85% increase in the energy savings estimated from implementing conventional vertical daylight strategies alone. Results presented in this study provide insight into energy and cost performance targets for dPOE coatings, which can help accelerate the development process and establish a successful new daylighting technology. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Key Considerations for U.S. Energy Policy
    Dewhurst, Charles
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2013, 111 (11A) : A3 - A4
  • [42] A comprehensive U.S. Energy policy [1]
    Burk, M.
    Deitchman, S.J.
    2001, American Association for the Advancement of Science (291)
  • [43] U.S. Department of Energy security technologies
    Smith, GD
    Piechowski, CJ
    Pocratsky, CA
    Sparks, MH
    35TH ANNUAL 2001 INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 19 - 26
  • [44] Impacts of U.S. Potential Energy Policies on Its Energy Industry and Implications for Chinese Oil Companies
    Hou Mingyang
    China Oil & Gas, 2024, 31 (06) : 20 - 24
  • [45] Lighting energy savings potential of split-pane electrochromic windows controlled for daylighting with visual comfort
    Fernandes, L. L.
    Lee, E. S.
    Ward, G.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 61 : 8 - 20
  • [46] Performance of skilled migrants in the U.S.: A dynamic approach
    Mattoo, Aaditya
    Neagu, Ileana Cristina
    Oezden, Caglar
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (05) : 829 - 843
  • [47] Potential energy savings from deployment of Dynamic Insulation Materials for US residential buildings
    Menyhart, Kathleen
    Krarti, Moncef
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 114 : 203 - 218
  • [48] U.S. market invasion: Imports soar from strong U.S. dollar & demand
    Wood Markets Newsletter, 2003, 8 (04): : 4 - 5
  • [49] Best Practices for Full-Scale Testing and Energy Savings, Daylighting and Visual Comfort Evaluation of Dynamic Shading
    Kunwar, Niraj
    Cetin, Kristen S.
    Passe, Ulrike
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2019, VOL 125, PT 2, 2019, 125 : 433 - 440
  • [50] An Eclectic Approach to Estimating U.S. Potential GDP
    Marc-André Gosselin
    René Lalonde
    Empirical Economics, 2006, 31 : 951 - 975