Location selection for logistics center with fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo methods

被引:95
|
作者
Ulutas, Alptekin [1 ]
Karakus, Can Bulent [2 ]
Topal, Ayse [3 ]
机构
[1] Sivas Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Int Trade & Logist, Sivas, Turkey
[2] Sivas Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, Sivas, Turkey
[3] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Business, Nigde, Turkey
关键词
CoCoSo; fuzzy SWARA; GIS; logistics center; location selection; MCDM; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; SUPPLY CHAIN; DECISION; TOPSIS; VIKOR; AHP;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-191400
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Logistics centers are home to many and varied facilities, such as storage, transportation of goods, handling, reassembling, clearing, disassembling, quality control, social services and providing accommodation, so on. Providing logistical activities from one location can provide some macro advantages, as well as regional development in developing countries. For the micro level, logistics center selection has an effective role in increasing the operational efficiency and decreasing the costs of the firms. While the wrong location selection for logistics center affects the operations and costs of the companies negatively, the optimal location selection increases the performance, competitiveness, profitability of the firms and reduces the costs of the firms. Since many different qualitative and quantitative criteria are considered in the selection of the logistics center, this selection problem is an MCDM problem. A new integrated MCDM model is proposed to solve this problem for Sivas province in Turkey. This study presents two contributions to the literature. Firstly, the number of studies related to CoCoSo method is limited in the literature, therefore, the CoCoSo method is proposed in this study. Secondly, a new integrated GIS-based MCDM model comprising fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo is introduced to literature to address the location selection problem for a logistics center. In this study, the results of CoCoSo method and the resulfts of other MCDM methods (COPRAS, VIKOR, ARAS, MOORA, and MABAC) are compared to test the accuracy of results obtained by CoCoSo. Besides, the criteria weights are changed and the possible changes in the results are tracked.
引用
收藏
页码:4693 / 4709
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Study of Rural Logistics Center Location Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Yingying
    Li, Yanfeng
    Liu, Sen
    Yang, Junai
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
  • [22] Location Selection for Regional Logistics Center Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
    Huang, Yingyi
    Wang, Xinyu
    Chen, Hongyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [23] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach based on Fuzzy Theory and Credibility Mechanism for Logistics Center Location Selection
    Wang, Bowen
    Xiong, Haitao
    Li, Ming
    Wang, Shimin
    THIRTEENTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, 2014, 2014, : 90 - 96
  • [24] Study on Location Selection of National Economy Mobilization Logistics Center based on Fuzzy-Grey Comprehensive Evaluation Method
    Tang, Pingzhou
    Tian, Huiying
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 5500 - 5503
  • [25] Strategic Warehouse Location Selection in Business Logistics: A Novel Approach Using IMF SWARA-MARCOS-A Case Study of a Serbian Logistics Service Provider
    Pajic, Vukasin
    Andrejic, Milan
    Jolovic, Marijana
    Kilibarda, Milorad
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [26] An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection
    Percin, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (02) : 531 - 552
  • [27] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    İrfan Ertuğrul
    Nilsen Karakaşoğlu
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 39 : 783 - 795
  • [28] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    Ertugrul, Irfan
    Karakasoglu, Nilsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (7-8): : 783 - 795
  • [29] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection
    Hanine, Mohamed
    Boutkhoum, Omar
    Tikniouine, Abdessadek
    Agouti, Tarik
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [30] CITY LOGISTICS TERMINAL LOCATION SELECTION USING COMBINED FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY TOPSIS ANALYSIS
    Tadic, Snezana
    Zecevic, Slobodan
    Krstic, Mladen
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING (ICTTE), 2012, : 345 - 357