A Comparative Study by AHP and TOPSIS for the Selection of All Round Excellence Award

被引:0
|
作者
Supraja, S. [1 ]
Kousalya, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] VITS Deshmukhi, Dept Math, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Anna Univ, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
TOPSIS; MCDM; AHP; FAHP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
TOPSIS Method is one of the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods. It is a ranking method. It gives both quantitative and qualitative study of the problem. Topsis Method gives best and quick decision to our real life problems than AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) Methods. Hence, in this study TOPSIS Method is applied to a problem of selection of a branch of students for "ALL ROUND EXCELLENCE AWARD" in an engineering college for which the solution is already obtained by AHP. According to T.L. Satty, if the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.1, then the matrix is said to be consistent. If the consistency ratio is zero the matrix is said to be absolutely consistent. In this paper the decisions obtained by AHP is compared with TOPSIS Method. It is observed that there inconsistency in the sample data (i.e.: few matrices in the data have consistency ratio is more than 0.1). Hence the ranking of alternatives obtained by both the methods is different. From this comparative study it is clear that if there is any inconsistency in the sample data the decisions differ from method to method.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 319
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multicriteria model on calculating the Sustainable Business Excellence Index of a firm with fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Metaxas, Ioannis N.
    Koulouriotis, Dimitrios E.
    Spartalis, Stefanos H.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (06) : 1522 - 1557
  • [22] Rank-Based Comparative Research Flow Benchmarking the Effectiveness of AHP-GTMA on Aiding Decisions of Shredder Selection by Reference to AHP-TOPSIS
    Zhuang, Zheng-Yun
    Lin, Chang-Ching
    Chen, Chih-Yung
    Su, Chia-Rong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [23] Supplier Selection Utilizing AHP and TOPSIS in a Fuzzy Environment Based on KPIs
    Safavi, Asal
    Bigham, Bahram Sadeghi
    Zahedi-Seresht, Mazyar
    CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS, 2025, 6 (01): : 574 - 593
  • [24] Software Design Projects Selection by Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Method
    Sun, Jin-Wen
    Kang, Yan
    Yang, Xiao-Dong
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND MECHANICAL DESIGN, MSMD 2015, 2015, : 613 - 619
  • [25] SYSTEMATIC SELECTION OF BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORMS USING FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS
    Muradi, Shahr Banoo
    Chiam, Yin Kia
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 36 (02) : 99 - 123
  • [26] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [27] AHP, Fuzzy Sets and TOPSIS Based Reliable Route Selection for MANET
    Saini, Vinay Kumar
    Kumar, Vivek
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2014, : 24 - 29
  • [28] A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection
    Lima Junior, Francisco Rodrigues
    Osiro, Lauro
    Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 21 : 194 - 209
  • [29] Selection of promotional media on tourist boats with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Utomo, Dutho Suh
    Cahyadi, Dedy
    Astuti, Indah Fitri
    Putra, Gubtha Mahendra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (05): : 140 - 148
  • [30] A combined topsis-ahp method for conveyor belt material selection
    Athawale, V.M.
    Chakraborty, S.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Part PR: Production Engineering Division, 2010, 90 (MARCH): : 8 - 13