A Comparative Study by AHP and TOPSIS for the Selection of All Round Excellence Award

被引:0
|
作者
Supraja, S. [1 ]
Kousalya, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] VITS Deshmukhi, Dept Math, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Anna Univ, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
TOPSIS; MCDM; AHP; FAHP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
TOPSIS Method is one of the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods. It is a ranking method. It gives both quantitative and qualitative study of the problem. Topsis Method gives best and quick decision to our real life problems than AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) Methods. Hence, in this study TOPSIS Method is applied to a problem of selection of a branch of students for "ALL ROUND EXCELLENCE AWARD" in an engineering college for which the solution is already obtained by AHP. According to T.L. Satty, if the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.1, then the matrix is said to be consistent. If the consistency ratio is zero the matrix is said to be absolutely consistent. In this paper the decisions obtained by AHP is compared with TOPSIS Method. It is observed that there inconsistency in the sample data (i.e.: few matrices in the data have consistency ratio is more than 0.1). Hence the ranking of alternatives obtained by both the methods is different. From this comparative study it is clear that if there is any inconsistency in the sample data the decisions differ from method to method.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 319
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Labelling robots selection based on ahp and topsis
    Zhang, Nuo
    Zhang, Fuxiang
    Huang, Yongjian
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Zhao, Yuejing
    Li, Rongting
    UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 82 (03): : 29 - 40
  • [3] Combining the AHP and TOPSIS to Evaluate Car Selection
    Ulkhaq, M. Mujiya
    Wijayanti, Wismar R.
    Zain, M. Syarifudin
    Baskara, Elan
    Leonita, Widya
    2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPILATION, COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (HP3C 2018), 2018, : 112 - 117
  • [4] Labelling robots selection based on ahp and topsis
    Zhang, Nuo
    Zhang, Fuxiang
    Huang, Yongjian
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Zhao, Yuejing
    Li, Rongting
    UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 82 (03): : 29 - 40
  • [5] Integration AHP and TOPSIS in Shipyard Location Selection
    Parkhan, Ali
    Vatimbing, Aldrin Daeng
    Widodo, Imam Djati
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2018, : 11 - 16
  • [6] A FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS FOR ELV DISMANTLING SELECTION
    Tadic, Danijela
    Arsovski, Slavko
    Stefanovic, Miladin
    Aleksic, Aleksandar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [7] A Comparative Study of the AHP and TOPSIS Techniques for Dam Site Selection Using GIS: A Case Study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran
    Jozaghi, Ali
    Alizadeh, Babak
    Hatami, Mohsen
    Flood, Ian
    Khorrami, Mohammad
    Khodaei, Nastaran
    Tousi, Erfan Ghasemi
    GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 8 (12)
  • [8] The Evaluation Study on Location Selection of Logistics Center Based on Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Wang, Shengyuan
    Liu, Peide
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 3779 - +
  • [9] Shipyard location selection based on fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Turk, Abdullah
    Ozkok, Murat
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (03) : 4557 - 4576
  • [10] Distribution Network Supplier Selection with Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Li, Zhiwei
    Sun, Liping
    He, Lanfei
    Tang, Xuejun
    Zou, Xuxia
    Chen, Minghua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 14TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2019), 2019, : 62 - 66