Effects of dynamic luminance modulation on visually induced self-motion perception: Observers' perception of illumination is important in perceiving self-motion

被引:6
|
作者
Nakamura, Shinji [1 ]
Seno, Takeharu [2 ]
Ito, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Sunaga, Shoji [2 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Fukushi Univ, Fac Child Dev, Div Clin Psychol, Mihama, Aichi 4703295, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Design, Minami Ku, Fukuoka 8158540, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
self-motion perception; vection; perceived illumination; CIRCULAR VECTION;
D O I
10.1068/p7321
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Coherent luminance modulation of visual objects affects visually induced perception of self-motion (vection). The perceptual mechanism underlying the effects of dynamic luminance modulation were investigated with a visual stimulus simulating an external environment illuminated by a moving spotlight (the normal spotlight condition) or an inverted luminance version of it (the inverted luminance condition). Two psychophysical experiments indicated that vection was generally weakened in the inverted luminance condition. The results cannot be fully explained by the undesirable differences of luminosity within the experimental environment, and suggest that the contrast polarity of the visual stimulus has a significant impact on vection. Furthermore, the results show that the dynamic luminance variations weaken vection in the normal spotlight condition in which the observers perceived illumination modulations. In contrast, in the inverted luminance condition, in which the observers cannot perceive the illumination manipulation, the dynamic luminance variations may not impair vection, and may even be expected to strengthen vection, even though they shared similar global and systematic luminance variation with the normal spotlight condition. These experiments suggest that the observer's perception of illumination is a key factor in considering the effects of dynamic luminance modulation of the visual stimulus.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects
    Mark Wexler
    Francesco Panerai
    Ivan Lamouret
    Jacques Droulez
    Nature, 2001, 409 : 85 - 88
  • [32] Visual motion stimulation, but not visually induced perception of self-motion, biases the perceived direction of verticality
    Thilo, KV
    Gresty, MA
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (02): : 258 - 263
  • [33] Separate Presentation of Additional Accelerating Motion Does not Enhance Visually Induced Self-Motion Perception
    Nakamura, Shinji
    MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 2013, 26 (03) : 277 - 285
  • [34] Effects of Stimulus Eccentricity on the Perception of Visually Induced Self-motion Facilitated by Simulated Viewpoint Jitter
    Nakamura, Shinji
    SEEING AND PERCEIVING, 2012, 25 (06): : 647 - 654
  • [35] A CORTICAL SUBSTRATE FOR MOTION PERCEPTION DURING SELF-MOTION
    THIER, P
    ERICKSON, RG
    DICHGANS, J
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1994, 17 (02) : 335 - 335
  • [36] COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF MOTION PERCEPTION DURING SELF-MOTION
    HADANI, I
    JULESZ, B
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1994, 17 (02) : 319 - 320
  • [37] Effects of depth, eccentricity and size of additional static stimulus on visually induced self-motion perception
    Nakamura, Shinji
    VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (15) : 2344 - 2353
  • [38] A role of cutaneous inputs in self-motion perception (1): Is perceived self-motion equal to an actual motion?
    Murata, Kayoko
    Komatsu, Hidemi
    Nakano, Yasushi
    Ichihara, Shigeru
    Ishihara, Masami
    Masuda, Naoe
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 344 - 345
  • [39] Motion parallax contribution to perception of self-motion and depth
    Douglas A. Hanes
    Julia Keller
    Gin McCollum
    Biological Cybernetics, 2008, 98 : 273 - 293
  • [40] Simulating self-motion I: Cues for the perception of motion
    Harris L.R.
    Jenkin M.R.
    Zikovitz D.
    Redlick F.
    Jaekl P.
    Jasiobedzka U.T.
    Jenkin H.L.
    Allison R.S.
    Virtual Reality, 2002, 6 (2) : 75 - 85