Questionnaire to measure the importance and satisfaction of university services from the student perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Zambrano, Jimmy R. [1 ]
Monica, Loachamin-Marcillo [2 ]
Monica, Pilco-Gallegos [3 ]
Wilson Javier, Pilco-Gallegos [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Inst Tecnol Super Ruminahui, Gerencia Educ, Quito, Ecuador
[3] Inst Tecnol Super Ruminahui, Adm Empresas, Quito, Ecuador
来源
CIENCIA UNEMI | 2019年 / 12卷 / 30期
关键词
Student satisfaction; satisfying factors; institutional quality; HIGHER-EDUCATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The measurement and continuous improvement of the services that the student receives are related to the healthy development of the university institutions. Although instruments are available to measure student satisfaction at the institutional level, the reports generally do not show their reliability. The objective of this study was to adapt, apply, and calculate the internal consistency (i.e., reliability) of Jacqueline's (2006) instrument that measures the importance and satisfaction of university services from a student perspective. A survey was applied to 757 students, from first to sixth semester of the different careers in presential and semi-presential modality, of a higher education institute in Ecuador. The items were classified into 10 factors: educational environment, student welfare, administrative quality, teaching quality, educational infrastructure, academic organization, research resources, student services, computer services and links with society. The results showed that the scales of each factor are reliable for both measures of importance and satisfaction. By comparing the importance and satisfaction scores, it was found that students are dissatisfied with all factors. The use of this instrument is recommended to improve its adaptation to multiple institutional conditions and to make more appropriate decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] VARIABLES RELATED TO UNIVERSITY STUDENT SATISFACTION
    SCHMIDT, DMK
    SEDLACEK, WE
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PERSONNEL, 1972, 13 (03): : 233 - 238
  • [22] University Student Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis
    Clemes, Michael D.
    Gan, Christopher E. C.
    Kao, Tzu-Hui
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 17 (02) : 292 - 325
  • [23] Student expectations of, and satisfaction with, the University Library
    Harwood, N
    Bydder, J
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 1998, 24 (02): : 161 - 171
  • [24] Quality and Satisfaction with the Surgical Medical Clerkship from a Student Perspective
    Froehlich, Susanne
    Goebel, Florian
    Meder, Adrian
    Wirkner, Janine
    Obertacke, Udo
    Kasch, Richard
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2018, 156 (06): : 639 - 645
  • [25] Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university
    Douglas, Jacqueline
    Douglas, Alex
    Barnes, Barry
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2006, 14 (03) : 251 - +
  • [26] Student satisfaction as a measure of student development: Towards a universal metric
    Beltyukova, SA
    Fox, CM
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 43 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [27] Improving student satisfaction of Andalas University Dormitory through Service Quality and Importance Performance Analysis
    Putri, Nilda Tri
    Anggraini, Larisa
    4TH ASIA PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, 319
  • [28] STUDENT PERSPECTIVE ON UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONALISATION
    Kompanets, Victoria
    Morgunova, Maria
    Vaatanen, Juha
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 3583 - 3593
  • [29] THE STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FROM 2000 TO 2005
    van Papendorp, D. H.
    Coetzee, M.
    Koorts, A. M.
    HEALTH SA GESONDHEID, 2007, 12 (01):
  • [30] Study of student permanence from the perspective of University Welfare at the National University of Colombia
    Cuadrado Montana, Julian Roberto
    Leon Guzman, Elizabeth
    OBRAS COLECTIVAS EN CIENCIAS DE LA COMPUTACION, 2018, : 297 - 312