Scoring system for the selection of high-risk patients in the intensive care unit

被引:26
|
作者
Iapichino, G [1 ]
Mistraletti, G
Corbella, D
Bassi, G
Borotto, E
Miranda, DR
Morabito, A
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Anestesiol & Rianimaz, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Cattedra Stat Med, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Groningen Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
critically ill; high risk; risk stratification; severity; intensity of care; EURICUS;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000206286.19444.40
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit greatly differ in severity and intensity of care. We devised a system for selecting high-risk patients that reduces bias by excluding low-risk patients and patients with an early death irrespective of the treatment. Design: A posteriori analysis of a multiple-center prospective observational trial. Setting: A total of 89 units from 12 European countries, with 12,615 patients. Intervention: Demographic and clinical data: severity of illness at admission, daily score of nursing workload, length of stay, and hospital mortality. Methods: We enrolled patients with intensive care unit length of stay of > 24 hrs. Three groups of high-risk patients were created: a) Severity group, those with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) over the median; b) Intensity-of-care group, patients with > 1 day of high level of care (assessed by logistic analysis); and c) MIX group, patients fulfilling both Severity and Intensity-of-care criteria. The groups were included in a logistic regression model (random split-sample design) to identify the characteristics associated with hospital mortality. We compared the outcome prediction of the SAPS II model (unsplit sample) against our model. Main Results. Out of 8,248 patients, the Severity method selected 3,838 patients, Intensity-of-care selected 4,244, and both methods combined selected 2,662 patients. There were 2,828 low-risk patients. Significant associations with hospital mortality were observed for: age, sites of admission, medical/unscheduled surgical admission, acute physiologic score of SAPS II, and the indicator variable "only Severity," "only Intensity-of-care," or MIX (developmental sample: calibration chi-square test, p = .205; area under the receiver operation characteristic curve, 0.814). Calibration and discrimination were better in our model than with the SAPS II model (unsplit sample). Conclusion: All three indicator variables select high-risk patients, the Severity/Intensity-of -care MIX being the most robust. These stratification criteria can improve case-mix selection for clinical and organizational studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1043
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF SKIN-TESTS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    FRANCOIS, G
    ALAZIA, M
    LONG, P
    BLANC, M
    BERNARD, D
    ANNALES DE L ANESTHESIOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 1981, 22 (03): : 265 - 269
  • [32] Mortality Risk Prediction by Application of Pediatric Risk of Mortality Scoring System in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
    Khajeh, Ali
    Noori, Noor Mohammad
    Reisi, Mohsen
    Fayyazi, Afshin
    Mohammadi, Mahdi
    Miri-Aliabad, Ghasem
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2013, 23 (05) : 546 - 550
  • [33] A Novel Situational Awareness Scoring System in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Baloglu, Orkun
    Kormos, Kristopher
    Worley, Sarah
    Latifi, Samir Q.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2022,
  • [34] Hematological Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Do we need a haematological Scoring System?
    Stoelzel, F.
    Kroschinsky, F.
    Friedrich, A.
    von Bonin, S.
    Bornhaeuser, M.
    Weise, M.
    Ehninger, G.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2016, 111 (04) : 382 - 383
  • [35] Intensive Care Unit Scoring Systems
    Pellathy, Tiffany Purcell
    Pinsky, Michael R.
    Hravnak, Marilyn
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2021, 41 (04) : 54 - 65
  • [36] Scoring systems in the intensive care unit
    Lewandowski, K
    Lewandowski, M
    ANAESTHESIST, 2003, 52 (10): : 965 - +
  • [37] AKI in Low-Risk versus High-Risk Patients in Intensive Care
    Sileanu, Florentina E.
    Murugan, Raghavan
    Lucko, Nicole
    Clermont, Gilles
    Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
    Handler, Steven M.
    Kellum, John A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 10 (02): : 187 - 196
  • [38] SCORING SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING PREGNANT PATIENTS WITH A HIGH-RISK OF PERINATAL MORTALITY
    HAERI, AD
    SOUTH, J
    NALDRETT, J
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY OF THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH, 1974, 81 (07): : 535 - 538
  • [39] IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY BY A SCORING SYSTEM
    WILSON, EW
    SILL, HK
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1973, 78 (503) : 437 - 440
  • [40] Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Arai, Shoshana
    Cohen, Neal H.
    Gropper, Michael A.
    Neuhaus, John
    Paul, Steven M.
    Miaskowski, Christine
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (11) : 2155 - 2160