How the environment is positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: a critical discourse analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Hufnagel, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kelly, Gregory J. [2 ]
Henderson, Joseph A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Sch Learning & Teaching, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, Newark, DE USA
关键词
Standards; discourse; policy; environmental education; science; EDUCATION POLICY RESEARCH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; CHALLENGES; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2017.1334876
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe how the environment and environmental issues are conceptualized and positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) to examine underlying assumptions about the environment. The NGSS are a recent set of science standards in the USA, organized and led by AchieveInc., that propose science education goals based on the National Research Council report, A Framework for K-12 Science Education. Drawing from critical discourse analysis, we present a detailed textual analysis of the NGSS to identify the positioning of the environment with respect to humans and human activity. This analysis shows patterns in the ways that the environment is conceptualized and inscribed in the standards as an entity separate from people through both exclusion and ambiguity. We also discuss findings about how agency is more often ascribed to actions or activities rather than people and when solutions to environmental issues are included, the focus is on technoscientific solutions. Finally, we provide implications for considering scientific and environmental literacy, education for action, and the role of standards documents in shaping educational practice.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 753
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spirituality and Standards for Practice: A Critical Discourse Analysis
    Cooper, Katherine Louise
    Chang, Esther
    Luck, Lauretta
    Dixon, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF HOLISTIC NURSING, 2022, 40 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [32] How is cultural diversity positioned in teacher professional standards? an international analysis
    Santoro, Ninetta
    Kennedy, Aileen
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2016, 44 (03) : 208 - 223
  • [33] Disciplinary Literacy Through the Lens of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Houseal, Ana
    Gillis, Victoria
    Helmsing, Mark
    Hutchison, Linda
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2016, 59 (04) : 377 - 384
  • [34] The Next Generation Science Standards: A potential revolution for geoscience education
    Wysession, Michael E.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2014, 2 (05) : 299 - 302
  • [35] Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Krajcik, Joseph
    Codere, Susan
    Dahsah, Chanyah
    Bayer, Renee
    Mun, Kongju
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 25 (02) : 157 - 175
  • [36] Connecting Current Research to the Next Generation Science Standards.
    Osheroff, H.
    Yu, K. R.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2018, 29 (26)
  • [37] The Next Generation Science Standards: Implications for Preservice and Inservice Science Teacher Education
    Lederman, Norman G.
    Lederman, Judith S.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 25 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [38] Aligning science courses for preservice elementary teachers with the Next Generation Science Standards
    Johnson, Amy Flanagan
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246
  • [39] Comparing Models of Nature of Science Dimensionality Based on the Next Generation Science Standards
    Harrison, George M.
    Seraphin, Kanesa Duncan
    Philippoff, Joanna
    Vallin, Lisa M.
    Brandon, Paul R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (08) : 1321 - 1342
  • [40] Educational Implications of Choosing "Practice" to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards
    Ford, Michael J.
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 99 (06) : 1041 - 1048