QTWiST analysis of the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Tabernero, Josep [1 ]
Van Cutsem, Eric [2 ]
Ohtsu, Atsushi [3 ]
Amellal, Nadia [4 ]
Cadour, Stephanie [4 ]
Fougeray, Ronan [4 ]
Haffemayer, Benjamin [5 ]
Mayer, Robert J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Vall dHebron Inst Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[4] Inst Rech Int Servier, Suresnes, France
[5] Servier, Market Access Dept, Suresnes, France
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERFORMANCE STATUS; ASSOCIATION; TAS-102;
D O I
10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000284
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose A Quality-adjusted Time WIthout Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (QTWiST) analysis was carried out to assess quality-adjusted survival time in the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods Duration of overall survival in the RECOURSE trial (n=798 patients) was partitioned into three discrete health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms or toxicity (TWIST) and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after randomisation and before progression or censoring. AEs were limited to those related to trifluridine/tipiracil and known to affect quality of life (QoL) (ie, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, fatigue/asthaenia, anorexia and febrile neutropaenia). The estimated mean duration of each state, weighted by a utility coefficient representing QoL, was combined into a global QTWiST score. Results In the RECOURSE trial, overall survival was 7.1 months with trifluridine/tipiracil versus 5.3 months with placebo. Patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil spent longer in each health state than placebo recipients. Using assumed utility coefficients of 1 for TWIST and 0.5 for TOX and REL, the QTWiST was 5.48 months for the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 3.98 months for the placebo group, a difference of 1.5 (95% CI 1.49 to 1.52) months in favour of trifluridine/tipiracil. A sensitivity analysis using large variations in utility coefficients for TOX and REL produced a range of only approximately 0.5 months from minimum to maximum QTWiST. Conclusions Quality-adjusted survival, as measured by QTWiST, shows clinically meaningful improvements in patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated mCRC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Daisuke Kotani
    Yasutoshi Kuboki
    Satoshi Horasawa
    Asumi Kaneko
    Yoshiaki Nakamura
    Akihito Kawazoe
    Hideaki Bando
    Hiroya Taniguchi
    Kohei Shitara
    Takashi Kojima
    Akihito Tsuji
    Takayuki Yoshino
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Rong-Rong
    Zhou, Hui-Jun
    Zeng, De-Yu
    Jiang, Shao-Feng
    Liu, Wu
    Fruehling, Petter
    Liu, Zhen-Yang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02) : 612 - 629
  • [43] Onset of neutropenia as an indicator of treatment response in the phase 3 RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Ohtsu, Atsushi
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Falcone, Alfredo
    Garcia-Carbonero, Rocio
    Argiles, Guillem
    Sobrero, Alberto F.
    Peeters, Marc
    Makris, Lukas
    Benedetti, Fabio M.
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    Shimada, Yasuhiro
    Yamazaki, Kentaro
    Komatsu, Yoshito
    Hochster, Howard S.
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    Ben Tran
    Yoshida, Kenichiro
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Mayer, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [44] Predicting Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment Outcomes in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Exploratory Analysis
    Prejac, Juraj
    Omcen, Tomislav
    Radic, Jasna
    Vrdoljak, Eduard
    Frobe, Ana
    Plestina, Stjepko
    ONCOLOGY, 2024, 102 (03) : 217 - 227
  • [45] Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis
    Nakashima, Masayuki
    Takeuchi, Masato
    Tanaka, Shiro
    Kawakami, Koji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (02) : 1055 - 1062
  • [46] Survival analysis based on the grade of neutropenia in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine-tipiracil
    Avino Tarazona, V.
    Rodriguez Garces, M.
    Amor Urbano, M.
    Bolanos Naranjo, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S140 - S140
  • [47] Trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Taieb, Julien
    Kuboki, Yasutoshi
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Kumar, Amit
    Hochster, Howard S. S.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [48] Trifluridine/tipiracil as a therapeutic option in real life setting of metastatic colorectal cancer: An efficacy and safety analysis
    Sur, Daniel
    Lungulescu, Cristina
    Spinu, Stefan
    Gorzo, Alecsandra
    Dumitrescu, Elena-Adriana
    Gheonea, Dan Ionut
    Lungulescu, Cristian-Virgil
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial
    Longo-Munoz, F.
    Argiles, G.
    Tabernero, J.
    Cervantes, A.
    Gravalos, C.
    Pericay, C.
    Gil-Calle, S.
    Mizuguchi, H.
    Carrato-Mena, A.
    Limon, M. L.
    Garcia-Carbonero, R.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (02): : 227 - 235
  • [50] Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan
    Kashiwa, Munenobu
    Matsushita, Ryo
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 42 (07) : 1376 - 1387