Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas in patients with chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

被引:64
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Sang Min [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Sub [1 ]
Park, Jin Young [1 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
LI-RADS; intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma; portal venous phase; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS; HEPATOBILIARY AGENTS; CLASSIFICATION; ALLOCATION; CIRRHOSIS; PATTERN; CT;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25287
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the utility of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas (IMCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board with waiver of informed consent. Pathologically confirmed IMCCs (n = 35) and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (n = 71) in patients with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T or 1.5T MRI were included. Three radiologists independently assigned LI-RADS categories for each IMCC or HCC. Diagnostic performances of LR-M (probable malignancy, not specific for HCC) and LR-5/5v (definitely HCC) were investigated, and imaging features were compared between IMCCs of LR-M and non-LR-M. ResultsIn all, 88.6% (31/35), 80.0% (28/35), and 74.3% (26/35) of IMCCs and 12.7% (9/71), 22.5% (16/71), and 16.9% (12/71) of HCCs were assigned as LR-M by the three reviewers with substantial interobserver agreements (kappa = 0.664-0.741). Among IMCCs, 2.9% (1/35), 5.7% (2/35), and 11.4% (4/35) were categorized as LR-5/5v. IMCCs of non-LR-M (n = 8, using the consensus method) were significantly smaller (24.1 17.4 vs. 62.8 +/- 30.6 mm, P = 0.002) and showed higher frequencies of arterial hyperenhancement (75.0% (6/8) vs. 7.4% (2/27), P < 0.001) and lower frequencies of non-HCC malignancy-favoring features such as peripheral enhancement (12.5% (1/8) vs. 77.8% (21/27), P = 0.002) or the target appearance on the hepatobiliary phase (0% (0/8) vs. 81.5% (22/27), P < 0.001) than IMCCs of LR-M (n = 27). ConclusionUsing LI-RADS, the majority of IMCCs can be accurately categorized as LR-M on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI; however, caution is warranted, as some atypical IMCCs may be assigned as LR-5/5v resulting in a false-positive diagnosis of HCC. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1330-1338.
引用
收藏
页码:1330 / 1338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Oh, Na Eun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Sehee
    Lee, Habeen
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 465 - 474
  • [22] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) : 4394 - 4405
  • [23] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Dong Ik Cha
    Kyung Mi Jang
    Seong Hyun Kim
    Tae Wook Kang
    Kyoung Doo Song
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4394 - 4405
  • [24] Use of gadoxetate disodium in patients with chronic liver disease and its implications for liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS)
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Heiken, Jay P.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (05) : 1236 - 1252
  • [25] Comparison of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver imaging reporting and data system to assess liver tumors before resection
    Chen, Mo-Fan
    Ho, Ming-Chih
    Kao, Jia-Horng
    Hwang, Ruey-Ming
    Deng, Shyh-Bang
    Yen, Kuang-Chen
    Liang, Po-Chin
    Wu, Chih-Horng
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (03) : 318 - 324
  • [26] Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
    Andrea Esposito
    Valentina Buscarino
    Dario Raciti
    Elena Casiraghi
    Matteo Manini
    Pietro Biondetti
    Laura Forzenigo
    La radiologia medica, 2020, 125 : 15 - 23
  • [27] Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
    Esposito, Andrea
    Buscarino, Valentina
    Raciti, Dario
    Casiraghi, Elena
    Manini, Matteo
    Biondetti, Pietro
    Forzenigo, Laura
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2020, 125 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [28] Is gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI limited in tumor characterization for patients with chronic liver disease?
    Kwon, Soyi
    Kim, Young Kon
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    Lee, Won Jae
    Choi, Dongil
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (10) : 1214 - 1222
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Helmberger, Thomas
    Ignee, Andre
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (05): : 499 - 506
  • [30] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for Hepatic Nodules in Cirrhotic Patients: A 2 year Retrospective Analysis
    Albrecht, Hana
    Gilroy, Richard
    Ash, Ryan
    O'Neil, Maura
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 413A - 414A