Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications

被引:4
|
作者
Haynes, RB
McKibbon, KA
Kanani, R
机构
来源
LANCET | 1996年 / 348卷 / 9024期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Low adherence of patients to prescribed, self-administered medical interventions is ubiquitous. Low adherence limits the benefits of current medical care. Efforts to assist patients to follow treatments might improve the efficiency of care and substantially enhance benefits. Our objective was to summarise the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to help patients follow prescriptions for medications. Methods A previous systematic review was updated through computerised searches in Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Psychinfo, and HSTAR online databases; bibliographies in articles on patient adherence; articles in the reviewers' personal collections; and contact with authors. Articles were judged of interest if they reported original data concerning an unconfounded RCT of an intervention to improve adherence with prescribed medications, with one or more measure of medication adherence, one or more measure of treatment outcome, at least 80% follow-up of each group studied, and, for longterm treatments, at least 6 months of follow-up for studies with positive initial findings. Information on study design features, interventions and controls, and findings were extracted by one reviewer (RK) and checked by the other two reviewers. Findings 1553 relevant citations and abstracts were screened, 252 full text articles were reviewed in detail, and 13 RCTs met all criteria. The studies were too disparate in clinical problems, adherence interventions, measures and reporting of adherence, and the clinical outcomes studied to warrant meta-analysis. Seven of 15 interventions were associated with improvements in adherence and six interventions led to improvements in treatment outcomes. For short-term treatments, one study showed an effect on adherence and outcome of counselling and written information. The interventions that were effective for long term care were complex, including various combinations of more convenient care, information, counselling, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, family therapy, and other forms of additional supervision or attention. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to substantial improvements in adherence. Interpretation Although adherence and treatment outcomes can be improved by certain-usually complex-interventions, full benefits of medications cannot be realised at currently achievable levels of adherence. It is time that additional efforts be directed towards developing and testing innovative approaches to assist patients to follow treatment prescriptions.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 386
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in dementia: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Livingston, Gill
    Kelly, Lynsey
    Lewis-Holmes, Elanor
    Baio, Gianluca
    Morris, Stephen
    Patel, Nishma
    Omar, Rumana Z.
    Katona, Cornelius
    Cooper, Claudia
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 205 (06) : 436 - 442
  • [42] A systematic review of randomised control trials of sexual health interventions delivered by mobile technologies
    Kara Burns
    Patrick Keating
    Caroline Free
    BMC Public Health, 16
  • [43] The fragility index in randomised controlled trials of interventions for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A systematic review
    Ramesh, Aravind, V
    Munby, Henry N. P.
    Thomas, Matt
    JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2024, 25 (02) : 164 - 170
  • [44] The effectiveness of psychological interventions for fatigue in cancer survivors: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    T. K. Corbett
    A. Groarke
    D. Devane
    E. Carr
    J. C. Walsh
    B. E. McGuire
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [45] CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS FOR ADULTS WITH URINARY INCONTINENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMISED TRIALS
    Imamura, M.
    Williams, K.
    Wells, M.
    McGrother, C.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (06) : 656 - 656
  • [46] Non-pharmacological Interventions for Adults with Autism: a Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Speyer, Renee
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Kim, Jae-Hyun
    Wilkes-Gillan, Sarah
    Nordahl-Hansen, Anders Johan
    Wu, Ho Ching
    Cordier, Reinie
    REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2022, 9 (02) : 249 - 279
  • [47] Analysis of recurrent events: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions to prevent falls
    Donaldson, Meghan G.
    Sobolev, Boris
    Cook, Wendy L.
    Janssen, Patti A.
    Khan, Karim M.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2009, 38 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [48] Nutritional interventions in randomised clinical trials for people with incurable solid cancer: A systematic review
    Mcluskie, Amy
    Bowers, Megan
    Bayly, Jo
    Yule, Michael S.
    Maddocks, Matthew
    Fallon, Marie
    Skipworth, Richard J. E.
    Laird, Barry J. A.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2025, 44 : 201 - 219
  • [49] Effectiveness and tolerance of exercise interventions for long COVID: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Mcdowell, Cillian P.
    Tyner, Barrie
    Shrestha, Shibu
    Mcmanus, Leah
    Comaskey, Fearghal
    Harrington, Patricia
    Walsh, Kieran A.
    O'Neill, Michelle
    Ryan, Mairin
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [50] Digital interventions for depression and anxiety in older adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Riadi, Indira
    Kervin, Lucy
    Dhillon, Sandeep
    Teo, Kelly
    Churchill, Ryan
    Card, Kiffer G.
    Sixsmith, Andrew
    Moreno, Sylvain
    Fortuna, Karen L.
    Torous, John
    Cosco, Theodore D.
    LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY, 2022, 3 (08): : E558 - E571