Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients

被引:141
|
作者
Davies, AR
Froomes, PRA
French, CJ
Bellomo, R
Gutteridge, GA
Nyulasi, I
Walker, R
Sewell, RB
机构
[1] Austin & Repatriat Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Austin & Repatriat Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin & Repatriat Med Ctr, Dept Nutr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
critical illness; gastrointestinal intubation; nutrition; enteral nutrition; parenteral nutrition; nutritional support; feeding methods; jejunostomy; gastroparesis;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200203000-00016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Critically ill patients often develop large gastric residual volumes during nasogastric feeding as a result of poor gastroduodenal motility. Nasojejunal feeding may decrease the severity of this complication, The aim of this study was to determine whether nasojejunal feeding improved tolerance of enteral nutrition by reducing gastric residual volumes. Design: Randomized, prospective, clinical study. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital. Patients: Seventy-three intensive care unit patients expected to require nutritional support for at least 3 days. Interventions. Patients were randomized to receive enteral nutrition via a nasojejunal tube (placed endoscopically) (34 patients) or a nasogastric tube (39 patients). A strict protocol was followed, which included regular gastric residual volume measurement (in both groups), the use of predetermined criteria for intolerance, and an attempt at nasojejunal feeding for those nasogastrically fed patients who were intolerant of enteral nutrition. Measurements and Main Results., Endoscopic placement of nasojejunal tubes was successful in 98% with no complications of insertion. Patients fed via a nasojejunal tube had 1) a reduced total gastric residual volume in both the first 24 (197 vs. 491 mL, p = .02) and 48 hrs (517 vs. 975 mL, p = .02); 2) a reduced incidence of a single gastric residual volume >150 mL (32% vs. 74%, p = .001); and 3) a trend toward a reduced incidence of intolerance of enteral nutrition (13% vs. 31%, p = .09). Only 13% of those nasogastrically fed patients who were initially intolerant of enteral nutrition remained intolerant once fed via a nasojejunal tube, and only 1.4% of all patients met criteria for commencement of parenteral nutrition. Conclusions: Enteral nutrition delivered via a nasojejunal tube is associated with a significant reduction in gastric residual volume, a strong trend toward improved tolerance of enteral nutrition, and an extremely low requirement for parenteral nutrition.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 590
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of gastrointestinal tolerance to two enteral feeding protocols in critically ill patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Pinilla, JC
    Samphire, J
    Arnold, C
    Liu, LY
    Thiessen, B
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2001, 25 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [42] Study on the effect of nasojejunal nutrition tube indwelling at the bedside of critically ill patients
    Shan, Lixia
    Wang, Kai
    Qu, Hui
    Zhu, Lijie
    Yuan, Yuan
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2023, 78 (03): : 315 - 317
  • [43] Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of ciprofloxacin administered through a nasogastric tube with continuous enteral feeding to critically ill patients
    O. Mimoz
    V. Binter
    A. Jacolot
    A. Edouard
    M. Tod
    O. Petitjean
    K. Samii
    Intensive Care Medicine, 1998, 24 : 1047 - 1051
  • [44] Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailabilty of ciprofloxacin administered through a nasogastric tube with continuous enteral feeding to critically ill patients
    Mimoz, O
    Binter, V
    Jacolot, A
    Edouard, A
    Tod, M
    Petitjean, O
    Samii, K
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (10) : 1047 - 1051
  • [45] Optimizing Nutritional Support in the Critically Ill: Evaluation of a Dedicated Team Approach to Placement of Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes
    Chen, A.
    Bucan, J.
    Muca, A.
    Finn, D.
    Davis, R.
    Iacco, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nasojejunal tube feeding for the prevention of pneumonia in adults who are critically ill
    Wang, Hongmei
    Huang, Chun
    Yang, Yang
    Kong, Lingxi
    Zheng, Xiaoying
    Shan, Xuefeng
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (05) : 1167 - 1175
  • [47] Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube in critically ill patients
    Roy, PM
    Person, B
    Souday, V
    Kerkeni, N
    Dib, N
    Asfar, P
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 24 (02) : 321 - 325
  • [48] Nasogastric tube placement in critically ill patients-stay alert!
    Werner, Paul
    Bernardi, Martin H.
    Laufer, Guenther
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (04) : 1546 - 1547
  • [49] Effect of acupuncture combined with spiral nasojejunal intubation on enteral nutrition in critically ill patients
    Sun, Zhiping
    Yang, Yuanqing
    Zhang, Zhilong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (12): : 16402 - 16408
  • [50] Feeding should be individualized in the critically ill patients
    Berger, Mette M.
    Pichard, Claude
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 25 (04) : 307 - 313