Identification and fine tuning of closed-loop processes under discrete EWMA and PI adjustments

被引:14
|
作者
Pan, R [1 ]
del Castillo, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
ARMA processes; system identification; process adjustment;
D O I
10.1002/qre.424
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Conventional process identification techniques of a open-loop process use the cross-correlation function between historical values of the process input and of the process output. If the process is operated under a linear feedback controller, however, the cross-correlation function has no information on the process transfer function because of the linear dependency of the process input on the output. In this paper, several circumstances where a closed-loop system can be identified by the autocorrelation function of the output are discussed. It is assumed that a proportional integral controller with known parameters is acting on the process while the output data were collected. The disturbance is assumed to be a member of a simple yet useful family of stochastic models, which is able to represent drift. It is shown that, with these general assumptions, it is possible to identify some dynamic process models commonly encountered in manufacturing. After identification, our approach suggests to tune the controller to a near-optimal setting according to a well-known performance criterion. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A simple approach for on-line PI controller tuning using closed-loop setpoint responses
    Shamsuzzoha, Mohammad
    Skogestad, Sigurd
    Halvorsen, Ivar J.
    20TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2010, 28 : 619 - 624
  • [42] Tuning PI/PD controllers based on gain/phase margins and maximum closed-loop magnitude
    Chen, CL
    Hsu, SH
    Huang, HP
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 1999, 30 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [43] Time complexity of closed-loop identification
    Wang, LY
    Yin, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2001, : 2007 - 2012
  • [44] Understanding closed-loop identification with ITCLI
    Rivera, D. E.
    Guzman, J. L.
    Berenguel, M.
    Dormido, S.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (28): : 739 - 744
  • [45] Grey Box Identification in Closed-loop
    Niemann, Henrik
    Miklos, Robert
    Poulsen, Niels Kjolstad
    2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 4990 - 4995
  • [46] Analytical Proportional-Integral (PI) Controller Tuning Using Closed-Loop Setpoint Response
    Hu, Wuhua
    Xiao, Gaoxi
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (04) : 2461 - 2466
  • [47] IDENTIFICATION OF A CLOSED-LOOP OF APERIODIC SYSTEMS
    DINDELEU.D
    MESURES REGULATION AUTOMATISME, 1974, 39 (05): : 37 - 42
  • [48] Identification and control - Closed-loop issues
    VandenHof, PMJ
    Schrama, RJP
    AUTOMATICA, 1995, 31 (12) : 1751 - 1770
  • [49] Closed-loop issues in system identification
    Van den Hof, P
    (SYSID'97): SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1547 - 1560
  • [50] Subspace identification of closed-loop systems
    Katayama, T
    SICE 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2002, : 1517 - 1520